The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advances in diagnostic practices affect thyroid cancer incidence in France
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyse trends in diagnostic practices of thyroid diseases and to relate them to the increase in thyroid cancer incidence in France over time. DESIGN: From 1980 to 2000, a French retrospective multicentric (three endocrinology and three nuclear medicine centres) study of thyroid diseases was conducted on 20 consecutive unselected patients' records, sampled every 5 years in each centre. METHODS: Characteristics of the population and diagnosis procedures (thyroid ultrasonography (US), radionuclide scan, cytology and hormonal measurements) were described over time. Changing trends in operated patients and in cancer prevalence were analysed as well as the impact of practices on cancer incidence. RESULTS: The study included 471 patients (82% female, mean age 46.7, range 9-84 years), referred for nodular thyroid diseases (66.7%) or thyroid dysfunctions (33.3%). A significant increase in US (3 to 84.8%) and cytological practices (4.5 to 23%), and a decrease (89.4 to 49.6%) in radionuclide scan procedures were observed over time. Although the proportion of patients undergoing surgery remained constant (24.8%), the prevalence of cancer increased among operated patients from 12.5 to 37% (P=0.006). In a Cox's proportional hazard model stratified on the clinical characteristics of patients, only the cytological practice, regardless of its results, was significantly associated with the occurrence of cancer: relative risk (RR)=4.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-16; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: From 1980 to 2000, a major evolution in clinical practices has led to the increase in thyroid cancer reported in France. Such changes in medical, as well as in surgical and pathological, practices must be taken into account in incidence measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Self-citationCooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Self-citationLeenhardt, L., Grosclaude, P., & Chérié-Challine, L. (2004) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2004.14.1056 · Cited by 384
Self-citationThyroid cancer: zealous imaging has increased detection and treatment of low risk tumours
Brito, J. P., Morris, J. C., & Montori, V. M. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f4706 · Cited by 323
Triggers of thyroid cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lincango-Naranjo, E., Solis-Pazmino, P., El Kawkgi, O., Salazar-Vega, J., Garcia, C., Ledesma, T., Rojas, T., Alvarado-Mafla, B., Young, G., Dy, B., et al. (2021) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-020-02588-8 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Leenhardt, L., Bernier, M., Boin-Pineau, M., Conte Devolx, B., Marechaud, R., Niccoli-Sire, P., Nocaudie, M., Orgiazzi, J., Schlumberger, M., Wemeau, J., Cherie-Challine, L., & De Vathaire, F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-139
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2124560590
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in diagnostic practices affect thyroid cancer incidence in France. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje.0.1500133
- The paper
- Leenhardt, L., Bernier, M., Boin-Pineau, M., Conte Devolx, B., Marechaud, R., Niccoli-Sire, P., Nocaudie, M., Orgiazzi, J., Schlumberger, M., Wemeau, J., Cherie-Challine, L., & De Vathaire, F. (2004). Advances in diagnostic practices affect thyroid cancer incidence in France. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1500133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.