The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in clinical practice: Safety and efficacy evaluation from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study
Abstract
Objective: The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is a highly effective new treatment option in acromegaly. The German Pegvisomant Observational Study (GPOS) was started to monitor long-term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant as prescribed in clinical practice. Design: GPOS is an observational, multi-center, surveillance study, which comprises non-interventional data collection. Methods: Of the 229 patients included in the study, 90.4% had previous pituitary surgery, 43.2% were treated by radiation therapy, and 94.3% had previous medical therapy for acromegaly that had been discontinued mainly due to persistent IGF-I elevation or side effects. The intention-to-treat population included 177 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. Results: IGF-I levels decreased from 1.75±0.91-fold the upper limit of normal at baseline to 1.05± 0.62 at the 6-month visit, 0.96±0.60 at the 12-month visit, and to 0.89±0.41-fold after 24 months (P<0.0001). Mean duration of pegvisomant therapy was 51.8±35.8 weeks (median=51.9 weeks). IGF-I was normalized in 64.4% at 6 months with a median dose of 15.0 mg/day, in 70.9% at 12 months, and in 76.3% at 24 months. Fasting glucose levels improved from 114.4±45.9 to 101.5± 42.8 mg/dl after 6 months (P<0.01) and to 100.6±33.2 mg/ml after 12 months (P<0.01). General physical condition measured by specific signs and symptoms score improved significantly. Adverse events occurring in >1% were injection site reactions in 7.4%, elevated liver enzymes (>3 times of normal) in 5.2% (3.1% spontaneously normalized during continued treatment), reported increase of pituitary tumor volume in 5.2% (which was verified in 3.1%), and headache in 1.7%. Conclusions: Pegvisomant is generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to that reported in clinical trials and can effectively reduce IGF-I in patients with acromegaly refractory to conventional therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ulbrich, K., Holá, K., Šubr, V., Bakandritsos, A., Tuček, J., & Zbořil, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589 · Cited by 1,730
Francis, G. L., Waguespack, S. G., Bauer, A. J., Angelos, P., Benvenga, S., Cerutti, J. M., Dinauer, C. A., Hamilton, J., Hay, I. D., Luster, M., et al. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0460 · Cited by 1,238
Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment
Melmed, S. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci39375 · Cited by 687
Ibrahim, M., Ramadan, E., Elsadek, N. E., Emam, S. E., Shimizu, T., Ando, H., Ishima, Y., Elgarhy, O. H., Sarhan, H. A., Hussein, A. K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.031 · Cited by 465
Polymeric nanostructured materials for biomedical applications
Tang, Z., He, C., Tian, H., Ding, J., Hsiao, B. S., Chu, B., & Chen, X. (2016) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.05.005 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreiber, I., Buchfelder, M., Droste, M., Forssmann, K., Mann, K., Saller, B., & Strasburger, C. J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-82
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2169376102
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in clinical practice: Safety and efficacy evaluation from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje.1.02312
- The paper
- Schreiber, I., Buchfelder, M., Droste, M., Forssmann, K., Mann, K., Saller, B., & Strasburger, C. J. (2007). Treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in clinical practice: Safety and efficacy evaluation from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.