The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry
Abstract
In 1996, the German Registry of Pituitary Tumors was founded by the Pituitary Section of the German Society of Endocrinology as a reference center for collection and consultant pathohistological studies of pituitary tumors. The experiences of the first 10 years of this registry based on 4122 cases will herein be reported. The data supplement former collections of the years 1970–1995 with 3480 surgically removed tumors or lesions of the pituitary region. The cases were studied using histology, immunostainings and in some cases also molecular pathology or electron microscopy. The adenomas were classified according to the current World Health Organization classification in the version of 2004. From 1996 on 3489 adenomas (84.6%), 5 pituitary carcinomas (0.12%), 133 craniophar-yngiomas (3.2%), 39 meningiomas (0.94%), 25 metastases (0.6%), 22 chordomas (0.5%), 115 cystic non-neoplastic lesions (2.8%), and 46 inflammatory lesions (1.1%, 248 other lesions or normal tissue (6.0%)) were collected by us. The adenomas (100%) were classified into densely granulated GH cell adenomas (9.2%), sparsely granulated GH cell adenomas (6.3%), sparsely granulated prolactin (PRL) cell adenomas (8.9%), densely granulated PRL cell adenomas (0.3%), mixed GH/PRL cell adenomas (5.2%), mammosomatotropic adenomas (1.1%), acidophilic stem cell adenomas (0.2%), densely granulated ACTH cell adenomas (7.2%), sparsely granulated ACTH cell adenomas (7.9%), Crooke cell adenomas (0.03%), TSH cell adenomas (1.5%), FSH/LH cell adenomas (24.8%), null cell adenomas (19.3%), null cell adenoma, oncocytic variant (5.8%), and plurihormonal adenomas (1.3%). Following the WHO classification of 2004, the new entity ‘atypical adenoma’ was found in 12 cases in 2005. Various prognostic parameters and clinical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chidiac, R. M., & Aron, D. C. (1997) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70242-5 · Cited by 140
Cited by
National Incidence and Prevalence of TSH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas in Sweden
Önnestam, L., Berinder, K., Burman, P., Dahlqvist, P., Engström, B. E., Wahlberg, J., & Nyström, H. F. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3362 · Cited by 148
Outcomes of proton therapy for patients with functional pituitary adenomas
Wattson, D. A., Tanguturi, S. K., Spiegel, D. Y., Niemierko, A., Biller, B. M. K., Nachtigall, L. B., Bussière, M. R., Swearingen, B., Chapman, P. H., Loeffler, J. S., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.068 · Cited by 125
The risk of osteopenia in premenopausal women with various sellar tumors
Zhao, Y., Gan, X., Luo, P., He, Q., Guo, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., & Fei, Z. (2012) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.3109/09513590.2012.683080 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Saeger, W., Lüdecke, D. K., Buchfelder, M., Fahlbusch, R., Quabbe, H.-J., & Petersenn, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-216
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2100396774
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje.1.02326
- The paper
- Saeger, W., Lüdecke, D. K., Buchfelder, M., Fahlbusch, R., Quabbe, H.-J., & Petersenn, S. (2007). Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.