Cited by 302Advanced Breast Cancer TherapiesEstrogen and related hormone effectsBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Therapeutically activating RB: reestablishing cell cycle control in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer

Open access
Thangavel, C., Dean, J. L., Ertel, A., Knudsen, K. E., Aldaz, C. M., Witkiewicz, A. K., Clarke, R., Knudsen, E. S.·2011·Endocrine Related Cancer

Abstract

The majority of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers are treated with endocrine therapy. While this is effective, acquired resistance to therapies targeted against ER is a major clinical challenge. Here, model systems of ER-positive breast cancers with differential susceptibility to endocrine therapy were employed to define common nodes for new therapeutic interventions. These analyses revealed that cell cycle progression is effectively uncoupled from the activity and functional state of ER in these models. In this context, cyclin D1 expression and retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) phosphorylation are maintained even with efficient ablation of ER with pure antagonists. These therapy-resistant models recapitulate a key feature of deregulated RB/E2F transcriptional control. Correspondingly, a gene expression signature of RB-dysfunction is associated with luminal B breast cancer, which exhibits a relatively poor response to endocrine therapy. These collective findings suggest that suppression of cyclin D-supported kinase activity and restoration of RB-mediated transcriptional repression could represent a viable therapeutic option in tumors that fail to respond to hormone-based therapies. Consistent with this hypothesis, a highly selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, PD-0332991, was effective at suppressing the proliferation of all hormone refractory models analyzed. Importantly, PD-0332991 led to a stable cell cycle arrest that was fundamentally distinct from those elicited by ER antagonists, and was capable of inducing aspects of cellular senescence in hormone therapy refractory cell populations. These findings underscore the clinical utility of downstream cytostatic therapies in treating tumors that have experienced failure of endocrine therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/erc-10-0262

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher CDK4 expression drives endocrine therapy resistance in HR-positive breast cancer patients.

    “Increased expression of CDK4 has been shown to drive resistance to endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive breast cancer. 4-7”

    From Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results section on RB activation reports that blocking CDK4/6 curtailed cell-cycle progression in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer models. The Discussion links resistance to sustained cyclin D1–dependent kinase activity, but the paper does not show that increased CDK4 expression drives resistance in HR-positive patients. Its mechanistic evidence comes primarily from models, not a patient-level test of that claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 302

Authors
Thangavel, C., Dean, J. L., Ertel, A., Knudsen, K. E., Aldaz, C. M., Witkiewicz, A. K., Clarke, R., & Knudsen, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Venue
Endocrine Related Cancer
Published
2011-03-02
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
333-345
ISSN
  • 1351-0088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6821
OpenAlex
W2137177885
Cited by
302
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Related Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Santen
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca131465-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA129134, R01 CA12934, R01-CA131465, R01CA099996)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
endocrine therapy resistance, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, retinoblastoma protein, retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, cyclin D1, CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, luminal B, cellular senescence, cell cycle arrest, antiestrogens, hormone-refractory breast cancer
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Cell Cycle, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Piperazines, Pyridines, Receptors, Estrogen, RNA, Messenger, Retinoblastoma Protein, Cyclin D1, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review