Morphological selection of human spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Summary.: Light microscopic assessment of human spermatozoa in post-coital samples of cervical mucus revealed a significant improvement in the general sperm morphology between the semen and the cervix. Further analysis showed that the excluded spermatozoa were more likely to be those with midpiece or tail defects that impaired motility. Significant changes were also found when the morphology of spermatozoa recovered from the uterus and Fallopian tubes following AIH was compared with the semen used for insemination: in the semen, uterus and oviducts there were respectively 53, 77 and 71% spermatozoa with completely normal morphology, and 12, 3 and 0·6% spermatozoa with defects of the midpiece and/or tail (as assessed by surface replica electron microscopy). Selection of spermatozoa in vitro by allowing them to swim upwards through a nickel mesh also reduced the number of spermatozoa with abnormal morphology, particularly of the midpiece and tail. It is concluded that the apparent selection of morphologically normal spermatozoa is not a direct function of the female tract, but that the spermatozoa can effect their own selection because of their differential motility.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selection for morphologically normal human spermatozoa within the cervical mucus exists.
“Previously, Mortimer and Templeton2425 confirmed the existence of selection for morphologically normal human spermatozoa within the cervical mucus.”
From Men with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology exhibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction (2017) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Ahlgren, M., Boström, . & Malmqvlst, R. (1974) Sperm transport and survival in women with special reference to the Fallopian tube. In Sperm Transport, Survival and Fertilizing Ability in Vertebrates, Vol. 26, pp. 183-200.
- Beatty, R.A. (1975) Genetics of animal spermatozoa. In Gamete Competition in Plants and Animals, pp. 61-68. Ed. D. L. Mulcahy. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
- Drevius, L.-O. (1975) Permeability of the bull-sperm membrane. In The Functional Anatomy of the Spermatozoon, pp. 373-383.
- Ed. B. A. Afzelius. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Eliasson, R. (1975) Analysis of semen. In Progress in Infertility, 2nd edn, Ch. 33, pp. 691-713.
- Eliasson, R. (1977) Semen analysis and laboratory workup. In Male Infertility, Workup, Treatment and Research, pp. 169-188.
- Moghlssl, K.S. (1977) Sperm migration through the human cervix. In The Uterine Cervix in Repro¬ duction, pp. 146-165.
- Mortimer, D. (1977a) Electron and light microscope studies of mammalian spermatozoa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
- Mortimer, D. (1978) Selectivity of sperm transport in the female genital tract. In Spermatozoa, Antibodies and Infertility, Ch. 5, pp. 37-53. Eds J. Cohen & W. F. Hendry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
- Overstreet, J.W. & Katz, D.F. (1977) Sperm transport and selection in the female genital tract. In Develop¬ ment in Mammals, Vol. 2, pp. 31-65. Ed. M. H. Johnson. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
- Perry, G., Glezerman, M. & Insler, V. (1977) Selective filtration of abnormal spermatozoa by the cervical mucus in vitro. In The Uterine Cervix in Repro¬ duction, pp. 118-127.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida
Menkveld, R., Franken, D. R., Kruger, T. F., Oehninger, S., & Hodgen, G. D. (1991) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.1080300409 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Smith, R., Kovac, J., Cajipe, M., Lamb, D., & Lipshultz, L. (2017) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/1008-682x.189211 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mortimer, D., Leslie, E. E., Kelly, R. W., & Templeton, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Birmingham Women's Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Mortimer, D.
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-03-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 391-399
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W2078357642
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- sperm morphology, sperm selection, cervical mucus, sperm motility, sperm tail defects, artificial insemination by husband, female reproductive tract
- MeSH terms
- Cervix Mucus, Female, Humans, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Sperm Transport, Spermatozoa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review