Cited by 97Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Morphological selection of human spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro

Open access
Mortimer, D., Leslie, E. E., Kelly, R. W., Templeton, A. A.·1982·Reproduction

Abstract

Summary.: Light microscopic assessment of human spermatozoa in post-coital samples of cervical mucus revealed a significant improvement in the general sperm morphology between the semen and the cervix. Further analysis showed that the excluded spermatozoa were more likely to be those with midpiece or tail defects that impaired motility. Significant changes were also found when the morphology of spermatozoa recovered from the uterus and Fallopian tubes following AIH was compared with the semen used for insemination: in the semen, uterus and oviducts there were respectively 53, 77 and 71% spermatozoa with completely normal morphology, and 12, 3 and 0·6% spermatozoa with defects of the midpiece and/or tail (as assessed by surface replica electron microscopy). Selection of spermatozoa in vitro by allowing them to swim upwards through a nickel mesh also reduced the number of spermatozoa with abnormal morphology, particularly of the midpiece and tail. It is concluded that the apparent selection of morphologically normal spermatozoa is not a direct function of the female tract, but that the spermatozoa can effect their own selection because of their differential motility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/jrf.0.0640391

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ahlgren, M., Boström, . & Malmqvlst, R. (1974) Sperm transport and survival in women with special reference to the Fallopian tube. In Sperm Transport, Survival and Fertilizing Ability in Vertebrates, Vol. 26, pp. 183-200.
  2. Beatty, R.A. (1975) Genetics of animal spermatozoa. In Gamete Competition in Plants and Animals, pp. 61-68. Ed. D. L. Mulcahy. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  3. Drevius, L.-O. (1975) Permeability of the bull-sperm membrane. In The Functional Anatomy of the Spermatozoon, pp. 373-383.
  4. Ed. B. A. Afzelius. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  5. Eliasson, R. (1975) Analysis of semen. In Progress in Infertility, 2nd edn, Ch. 33, pp. 691-713.
  6. Eliasson, R. (1977) Semen analysis and laboratory workup. In Male Infertility, Workup, Treatment and Research, pp. 169-188.
  7. Moghlssl, K.S. (1977) Sperm migration through the human cervix. In The Uterine Cervix in Repro¬ duction, pp. 146-165.
  8. Mortimer, D. (1977a) Electron and light microscope studies of mammalian spermatozoa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
  9. Mortimer, D. (1978) Selectivity of sperm transport in the female genital tract. In Spermatozoa, Antibodies and Infertility, Ch. 5, pp. 37-53. Eds J. Cohen & W. F. Hendry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  10. Overstreet, J.W. & Katz, D.F. (1977) Sperm transport and selection in the female genital tract. In Develop¬ ment in Mammals, Vol. 2, pp. 31-65. Ed. M. H. Johnson. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  11. Perry, G., Glezerman, M. & Insler, V. (1977) Selective filtration of abnormal spermatozoa by the cervical mucus in vitro. In The Uterine Cervix in Repro¬ duction, pp. 118-127.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mortimer, D., Leslie, E. E., Kelly, R. W., & Templeton, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Birmingham Women's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Reproduction
Published
1982-03-01
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
391-399
ISSN
  • 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-7899
OpenAlex
W2078357642
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm morphology, sperm selection, cervical mucus, sperm motility, sperm tail defects, artificial insemination by husband, female reproductive tract
MeSH terms
Cervix Mucus, Female, Humans, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Sperm Transport, Spermatozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review