The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves
Abstract
Summary. For 18 two-wave interovulatory intervals in heifers, the follicular waves were first detected on Days −0·2 ± 0·1 and 9·6 ± 0·2, and for 4 three-wave intervals on Days −0·5 ± 0·3, 9·0 ± 0·0 and 16·0 ± 1·1 (ovulation is Day 0). The day-to-day mean diameter profile of the dominant follicle of the 1st wave and the day of emergence of the 2nd wave were not significantly different between 2-wave and 3-wave intervals. There were no indications, therefore, that events occurring during the first half of the interovulatory interval were associated with the later emergence of a 3rd wave. The dominant ovulatory follicle differed significantly (P < 0·05 at least) between 2-wave and 3-wave intervals in day of emergence (Day 9·6 ± 0·2 and 16·0 ± 1·1), length of interval from emergence of follicle to ovulation (10·9 ± 0·4 and 6·8 ± 0·6 days), and diameter on day before ovulation (16·5 ± 0·4 and 13·9 ± 0·4 mm). The mean length of 2-wave interovulatory intervals (20·4 ± 0·3 days) was shorter (P < 0·01) than for 3-wave intervals (22·8 ± 0·6 days). The mean day of luteal regression for 2-wave and 3-wave intervals was 16·5 ± 0·4 and 19·2 ± 0·5 (P < 0·01). For all intervals, luteal regression occurred after emergence of the ovulatory wave, and the next wave did not emerge until near the day of ovulation at the onset of the subsequent interovulatory interval. In conclusion, the emergence of a 3rd wave was associated with a longer luteal phase, and the viable dominant follicle present at the time of luteolysis became the ovulatory follicle. Keywords: follicles; corpus luteum; cattle; follicular waves
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ovarian Follicular Growth and Development in Mammals1
Fortune, J. E. (1994) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod50.2.225 · Cited by 772
Adams, G. P., Matteri, R. L., Kastelic, J. P., Ko, J. C. H., & Ginther, O. J. (1992) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0940177 · Cited by 676
Self-citationOvarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: A review
Baerwald, A. R., Adams, G. P., & Pierson, R. A. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr039 · Cited by 487
Follicular Deviation and Acquisition of Ovulatory Capacity in Bovine Follicles1
Sartori, R., Fricke, P. M., Ferreira, J. C. P., Ginther, O. J., & Wiltbank, M. C. (2001) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1403 · Cited by 441
Self-citationA new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle
Baerwald, A. R., Adams, G. P., & Pierson, R. A. (2003) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00544-2 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Ginther, O. J., Knopf, L., & Kastelic, J. P.
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-09-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-230
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W1970416630
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/jrf.0.0870223
- The paper
- Ginther, O. J., Knopf, L., & Kastelic, J. P. (1989). Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0870223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.