The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Follicular Deviation and Acquisition of Ovulatory Capacity in Bovine Follicles1
Open accessAbstract
Selection of dominant follicles in cattle is associated with a deviation in growth rate between the dominant and largest subordinate follicle of a wave (diameter deviation). To determine whether acquisition of ovulatory capacity is temporally associated with diameter deviation, cows were challenged with purified LH at known times after a GnRH-induced LH surge (experiment 1) or at known follicular diameters (experiments 2 and 3). A 4-mg dose of LH induced ovulation in all cows when the largest follicle was > or =12 mm (16 of 16), in 17% (1 of 6) when it was 11 mm, and no ovulation when it was < or =10 mm (0 of 19). To determine the effect of LH dose on ovulatory capacity, follicular dynamics were monitored every 12 h, and cows received either 4 or 24 mg of LH when the largest follicle first achieved 10 mm in diameter (experiment 2). The proportion of cows ovulating was greater (P < 0.05) for the 24-mg (9 of 13; 69.2%) compared with the 4-mg (1 of 13; 7.7%) LH dose. To determine the effect of a higher LH dose on follicles near diameter deviation, follicular dynamics were monitored every 8 h, and cows received 40 mg of LH when the largest follicle first achieved 7.0, 8.5, or 10.0 mm (experiment 3). No cows with a follicle of 7 mm (0 of 9) or 8.5 mm (0 of 9) ovulated, compared with 80% (8 of 10) of cows with 10-mm follicles. Thus, follicles acquired ovulatory capacity at about 10 mm, corresponding to about 1 day after the start of follicular deviation, but they required a greater LH dose to induce ovulation compared with larger follicles. We speculate that acquisition of ovulatory capacity may involve an increased expression of LH receptors on granulosa cells of the dominant follicle and that this change may also be important for further growth of the dominant follicle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barr, A. J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,198
Ginther, O. J., Knopf, L., & Kastelic, J. P. (1989) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0870223 · Cited by 691
Self-citationAdams, G. P., Matteri, R. L., Kastelic, J. P., Ko, J. C. H., & Ginther, O. J. (1992) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0940177 · Cited by 676
Self-citationSelection of the Dominant Follicle in Cattle1
Ginther, O. J., Wiltbank, M. C., Fricke, P. M., Gibbons, J. R., & Kot, K. (1996) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod55.6.1187 · Cited by 645
Self-citationPattern of growth of dominant follicles during the oestrous cycle of heifers
Savio, J. D., Keenan, L., Boland, M. P., & Roche, J. F. (1988) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0830663 · Cited by 583
Xu, Z., Allen Garverick, H., Smith, G. W., Smith, M. F., Hamilton, S. A., & Youngquist, R. S. (1995) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod53.4.951 · Cited by 436
Factors that affect ovarian follicular dynamics in cattle
Lucy, M. C., Savio, J. D., Badinga, L., De La Sota, R. L., & Thatcher, W. W. (1992) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1992.70113615x · Cited by 394
Ultrasonic imaging of the ovaries and uterus in cattle
Pierson, R. A., & Ginther, O. J. (1988) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/0093-691x(88)90029-5 · Cited by 286
Self-citationBao, B., Allen Garverick, H., Smith, G. W., Smith, M. F., Salfen, B. E., & Youngquist, R. S. (1997) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod56.5.1158 · Cited by 258
Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers
Martínez, M. F., Adams, G. P., Bergfelt, D. R., Kastelic, J. P., & Mapletoft, R. J. (1999) · Animal Reproduction Science · doi:10.1016/s0378-4320(99)00057-3 · Cited by 202
Cited by
Gonçalves, P. B., Ferreira, R., Gasperin, B., & Oliveira, J. F. (2012) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-11-0192 · Cited by 57
Tonellotto dos Santos, J., Ferreira, R., Gasperin, B. G., Siqueira, L. C., de Oliveira, J. F., Santos, R. A., Reis, A. M., & Gonçalves, P. B. (2012) · Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System · doi:10.1177/1470320311417273 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Sartori, R., Fricke, P. M., Ferreira, J. C. P., Ginther, O. J., & Wiltbank, M. C.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1403-1409
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2089147555
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follicular Deviation and Acquisition of Ovulatory Capacity in Bovine Follicles1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1403
- The paper
- Sartori, R., Fricke, P. M., Ferreira, J. C. P., Ginther, O. J., & Wiltbank, M. C. (2001). Follicular Deviation and Acquisition of Ovulatory Capacity in Bovine Follicles1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.