Cited by 243Reproductive Physiology in LivestockGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockBirth, Development, and Health

Factors affecting birth weight in sheep: maternal environment

Open access
Gardner, D S, Buttery, P J, Daniel, Z, Symonds, M E·2007·Reproduction

Abstract

Knowledge of factors affecting variation in birth weight is especially important given the relationship of birth weight to neonatal and adult health. The present study utilises two large contemporary datasets in sheep of differing breeds to explore factors that influence weight at term. For dataset one (Study 1; n=154 Blue-faced Leicester×Swaledale (Mule) and 87 Welsh Mountain ewes, 315 separate cases of birth weight), lamb birth weight as the outcome measure was related to maternal characteristics and individual energy intake of the ewe during specified periods of gestation, i.e. early (1–30 days; term ~147 days gestation), mid (31–80 days) or late (110–147 days) pregnancy. For dataset two (Study 2; n=856 Mule ewes and 5821 cases of birth weight), we investigated using multilevel modelling the influence of ewe weight, parity, barrenness, lamb sex, litter size, lamb mortality and year of birth on lamb birth weight. For a subset of these ewes (n=283), the effect of the ewes’ own birth weight was also examined. Interactions between combinations of variables were selectively investigated. Litter size, as expected, had the single greatest influence on birth weight with other significant effects being year of birth, maternal birth weight, maternal nutrition, sex of the lamb, ewe barrenness and maternal body composition at mating. The results of the present study have practical implications not only for sheep husbandry but also for the increased knowledge of factors that significantly influence variation in birth weight; as birth weight itself has become a significant predictor of later health outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/rep-06-0042

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. AFRC Energy and protein requirements of ruminants, An Advisory Manual Prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients 1993 Oxford CAB International
  2. Alexander G Elliot K Knight J Birth weight of lambs: influences and consequences Size at Birth 1974 215 245 Amsterdam Elsevier

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, D. S., Buttery, P. J., Daniel, Z., & Symonds, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Reproduction
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
297-307
ISSN
  • 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-7899
OpenAlex
W2019069086
Cited by
243
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (BS/03/001/15219)
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
  • University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
lamb birth weight, maternal environment, ewe nutrition, maternal weight, litter size, lamb sex, maternal birth weight, birth year, gestation, sheep breeds, Swaledale, Welsh mountains, lamb mortality, maternal body composition
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Birth Weight, Body Weight, Breeding, Energy Intake, Environment, Female, Gestational Age, Infertility, Litter Size, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Animal, Sheep, Domestic, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review