Cited by 17Sperm and Testicular FunctionGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Reproductive performance primarily depends on the female genotype in a two-factorial breeding experiment using high-fertility mouse lines

Open access
Langhammer, Martina, Michaelis, Marten, Hartmann, Michaela F, Wudy, Stefan A, Sobczak, Alexander, Nürnberg, Gerd, Reinsch, Norbert, Schön, Jennifer +1 more·2017·Reproduction

Abstract

Mouse models showing an improved fertility phenotype are barely described in the literature. In the present study, we further characterized two outbred mouse models that have been selected for the phenotype 'high fertility' for more than 177 generations (fertility lines (FL) 1 and 2). In order to delineate the impact of males and females on fertility parameters, we performed a two-factorial breeding experiment by mating males and females of the three different genotypes (FL1, FL2, unselected control (Ctrl)) in all 9 possible combinations. Reproductive performance, such as number of offspring per litter or total birth weight of the entire pup, mainly depends on the female genotype. Although the reproductive performance of FL1 and FL2 is very similar, their phenotypes differ. FL2 animals of both genders are larger compared to FL1 and control animals. Females of the control line delivered offspring earlier compared to FL1 and FL2 dams. Males of FL1 are the lightest and the only ones who gained weight during the two weeks mating period. To address whether this effect is correlated with differing serum androgen levels, we measured the concentrations of testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, 4-androstenedione, androstanediol and dihydrotestosterone in males of all three lines by GC-MS. We measured serum testosterone between 5.0 and 6.4 ng/mL, whereas the concentrations of the other androgens were at least one order of magnitude lower, with no significant differences between the lines. Our data indicate that reproductive outcome largely depends on the genotype of the female in a two-factorial breeding experiment and supports previous findings that the phenotype 'high fertility' is warranted by using different physiological strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/rep-16-0434

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In combination with MS as the detection method, GC-MS presents a robust analytical tool, unsurpassed in determining simultaneously a multitude of steroids including precursors or metabolites of progestins, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, androgens and estrogens.

    “In combination with MS as the detection method, GC-MS presents a robust analytical tool, unsurpassed in determining simultaneously a multitude of steroids including precursors or metabolites of progestins, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids (all C21-steroids), androgens (C19-steroids) and estrogens (C18steroids) (289,290).”

    From Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia—Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management (2022) · cites this paper as [289]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) calls stable-isotope dilution GC-MS the gold standard for steroid analysis and says it can measure multiple steroids simultaneously from one sample. The GC-MS methods section (page unavailable) lists androgens, progestins and glucocorticoid-related steroids, but the paper does not establish simultaneous determination of estrogens or mineralocorticoids. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langhammer, M., Michaelis, M., Hartmann, M. F., Wudy, S. A., Sobczak, A., Nürnberg, G., Reinsch, N., Schön, J., & Weitzel, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Institute of Reproductive Biology   Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, FBN, Dummerstorf, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
Corresponding author
Weitzel, Joachim M
Venue
Reproduction
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
153
Issue
3
Pages
361-368
ISSN
  • 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-7899
OpenAlex
W2572239510
Cited by
17
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
fertility selection, reproductive performance, litter size, birth weight, serum androgens, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, 4-androstenedione, androstanediol, dihydrotestosterone, sex differences in fertility
MeSH terms
Androgens, Animals, Breeding, Female, Fertility, Genotype, Male, Phenotype, Reproduction, Testosterone, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review