The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in mouse, hamster and monkey testicular tissue after cryopreservation and heterotopic grafting to castrated hosts
Open accessAbstract
Retrieval, extracorporal storage and autotransplantation of testicular tissue could become an important strategy for preserving male gonadal function. The present study used syngeneic and immunodeficient nude mice as hosts, and immature and adult mice, neonatal and adult photoregressed Djungarian hamsters and neonatal marmosets to identify the potential of testicular tissue grafting to maintain the morphological and functional integrity of the testis. Testicular tissue was grafted s.c. either as fresh tissue or after cryopreservation into adult, orchidectomized hosts. The mice that received rodent testis tissue were autopsied 50 days later, and blood samples were collected. Sixty-five per cent of mouse isografts contained morphologically normal testicular tissue and seminiferous tubules with some degree of spermatogenic recovery. Mature spermatozoa were recovered after enzymatic disaggregation. Although the recovery of spermatogenesis was limited in adult mouse and hamster tissue, complete spermatogenesis was observed in grafts from immature rodents. Testicular tissue from neonatal marmosets developed up to the stage of spermatocytes at day 135 after xenografting. Androgen concentrations were comparable in intact control mice and in mice receiving fresh mouse and hamster grafts, slightly lower in mice receiving cryopreserved grafts and adult photoregressed hamster tissue, and low in castrated control mice and in mice receiving marmoset tissue. These results show that isografts and xenografts of immature and adult testicular tissue become functionally active as a s.c. graft in the mouse and that this approach might be useful in combination with cryopreservation as a tool for storage and activation of the male germ line and androgen replacement therapy in patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?
Wallace, W. H. B., Anderson, R. A., & Irvine, D. S. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70092-9 · Cited by 819
Picton, H. M., Wyns, C., Anderson, R. A., Goossens, E., Jahnukainen, K., Kliesch, S., Mitchell, R. T., Pennings, G., Rives, N., Tournaye, H., et al. (2015) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev190 · Cited by 354
Self-citationOptions for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys
Wyns, C., Curaba, M., Vanabelle, B., Van Langendonckt, A., & Donnez, J. (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp054 · Cited by 263
Wang, X., Ding, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Ma, L., & Xie, X. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.049 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlatt, S., Kim, S. S., & Gosden, R.
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-346
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W2152450048
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in mouse, hamster and monkey testicular tissue after cryopreservation and heterotopic grafting to castrated hosts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/rep.0.1240339
- The paper
- Schlatt, S., Kim, S. S., & Gosden, R. (2002). Spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in mouse, hamster and monkey testicular tissue after cryopreservation and heterotopic grafting to castrated hosts. Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1240339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.