Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Options for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys

Open access
Wyns, C., Curaba, M., Vanabelle, B., Van Langendonckt, A., Donnez, J.·2010·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fertility in adult life may be severely impaired by gonadotoxic therapies. For young boys who do not yet produce spermatozoa, cryopreservation of immature testicular tissue (ITT) is an option to preserve their fertility, albeit still experimental. This paper covers current options for ITT cryopreservation and fertility restoration. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by an extensive Medline search of English and French language articles. Search terms were: gonadotoxicity, cytoprotection, cryopreservation, ITT, spermatogonia, testicular transplantation, testicular grafting and in vitro maturation (IVM). RESULTS: Although no effective gonadoprotective drug is yet available for in vivo spermatogonial stem cell protection in humans, current evidence supports the feasibility of ITT cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatment with a view to fertility preservation. Controlled slow freezing with dimethyl sulfoxide allows survival and proliferation of human spermatogonia after xenotransplantation, but only partial differentiation. Animal data look promising, since healthy offspring have been obtained after transplantation of frozen testicular cell suspensions or tissue pieces. However, none of the fertility restoration options from frozen tissue, i.e. cell suspension transplantation, tissue grafting and IVM have proved efficient and safe in humans as yet. CONCLUSION: While additional evidence is required to define optimal conditions for ITT cryopreservation with a view to transplantation or IVM, the putative indications for such techniques, as well as their limitations according to disease, are outlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dmp054

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Wyns, C., Curaba, M., Vanabelle, B., Van Langendonckt, A., & Donnez, J.
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2010-01-04
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
312-328
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2168609343
Cited by
263
References
110
FWCI
22.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Options for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmp054
The paper
Wyns, C., Curaba, M., Vanabelle, B., Van Langendonckt, A., & Donnez, J. (2010). Options for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp054

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.