Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models
Open accessAbstract
The phenomenon of genotype × environment (G × E) interaction in plant breeding decreases selection accuracy, thereby negatively affecting genetic gains. Several genomic prediction models incorporating G × E have been recently developed and used in genomic selection of plant breeding programs. Genomic prediction models for assessing multi-environment G × E interaction are extensions of a single-environment model, and have advantages and limitations. In this study, we propose two multi-environment Bayesian genomic models: the first model considers genetic effects [Formula: see text] that can be assessed by the Kronecker product of variance-covariance matrices of genetic correlations between environments and genomic kernels through markers under two linear kernel methods, linear (genomic best linear unbiased predictors, GBLUP) and Gaussian (Gaussian kernel, GK). The other model has the same genetic component as the first model [Formula: see text] plus an extra component, F: , that captures random effects between environments that were not captured by the random effects [Formula: see text] We used five CIMMYT data sets (one maize and four wheat) that were previously used in different studies. Results show that models with G × E always have superior prediction ability than single-environment models, and the higher prediction ability of multi-environment models with [Formula: see text] over the multi-environment model with only u occurred 85% of the time with GBLUP and 45% of the time with GK across the five data sets. The latter result indicated that including the random effect f is still beneficial for increasing prediction ability after adjusting by the random effect [Formula: see text].
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
G × E model has high significance rates and better genomic predictions compared to other models in 4 wheat and 1 maize cultivars and CIMMYT data bank.
“These methods are applied on 4 wheat and 1 maize cultivars and CIMMYT data bank revealed that the G × E model have high significance rates and better genomic predictions as compared to other models [160].”
From Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [160]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Cuevas, J., Crossa, J., Montesinos-López, O. A., Burgueño, J., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., & de los Campos, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Quintana Roo (MX)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- Universidad de Colima (MX)
- Colegio de Postgraduados, C. P. 56230 Montecillos, Edo. de México, México
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
- Corresponding author
- Crossa, José
- Venue
- G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-53
- ISSN
- 2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5217122
- OpenAlex
- W2540923435
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- gene-environment interaction, Kronecker product covariance structure, genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Gaussian kernel, genomic selection, maize, wheat, prediction accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Plant Breeding, Bayes Theorem, Zea mays, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Triticum, Genome, Plant, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Gene-Environment Interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review