Cited by 88Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ULTRAPETALA1 Gene Functions Early in Arabidopsis Development to Restrict Shoot Apical Meristem Activity and Acts Through WUSCHEL to Regulate Floral Meristem Determinacy

Abstract

Shoot and floral meristem activity in higher plants is controlled by complex signaling networks consisting of positive and negative regulators. The Arabidopsis ULTRAPETALA1 (ULT1) gene has been shown to act as a negative regulator of meristem cell accumulation in inflorescence and floral meristems, as loss-of-function ult1 mutations cause inflorescence meristem enlargement, the production of extra flowers and floral organs, and a decrease in floral meristem determinacy. To investigate whether ULT1 functions in known meristem regulatory pathways, we generated double mutants between ult1 alleles and null alleles of the meristem-promoting genes SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) and WUSCHEL (WUS). We found that, although the ult1 alleles have no detectable embryonic or vegetative phenotypes, ult1 mutations restored extensive organ-forming capability to stm null mutants after germination and increased leaf and floral organ production in stm partial loss-of-function mutants. Mutations in ULT1 also partially suppressed the wus shoot and floral meristem phenotypes. However, wus was epistatic to ult1 in the center of the flower, and WUS transcriptional repression was delayed in ult1 floral meristems. Our results show that during the majority of the Arabidopsis life cycle, ULT1 acts oppositely to STM and WUS in maintaining meristem activity and functions in a separate genetic pathway. However, ULT1 negatively regulates WUS to establish floral meristem determinacy, acting through the WUS-AG temporal feedback loop.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.104.028787

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 1993, Development, 119, 823, 10.1242/dev.119.3.823 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1989, Plant Cell, 1, 37
  3. 2000, Science, 289, 617, 10.1126/science.289.5479.617 · DOI
  4. 2000, Nature, 408, 967, 10.1038/35050091 · DOI
  5. 2002, Development, 129, 1957, 10.1242/dev.129.8.1957 · DOI
  6. 1996, Development, 122, 1567, 10.1242/dev.122.5.1567 · DOI
  7. 1997, Cell, 89, 575, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80239-1 · DOI
  8. 1991, Cell, 65, 991, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90551-9 · DOI
  9. 2001, Development, 128, 1323, 10.1242/dev.128.8.1323 · DOI
  10. 1999, Science, 283, 1911, 10.1126/science.283.5409.1911 · DOI
  11. 2002, Development, 129, 3207, 10.1242/dev.129.13.3207 · DOI
  12. 1999, Plant Cell, 11, 1925, 10.1105/tpc.11.10.1925 · DOI
  13. 1996, Development, 122, 87, 10.1242/dev.122.1.87 · DOI
  14. 2003, Development, 130, 3163, 10.1242/dev.00525 · DOI
  15. 2001, Cell, 105, 805, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00390-7 · DOI
  16. 2002, Development, 129, 3195, 10.1242/dev.129.13.3195 · DOI
  17. 2001, Cell, 105, 793, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00384-1 · DOI
  18. 1998, Development, 125, 3027, 10.1242/dev.125.16.3027 · DOI
  19. 1998, Cell, 95, 805, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81703-1 · DOI
  20. 1995, Plant Mol. Biol., 28, 767, 10.1007/BF00042064 · DOI
  21. 1997, Plant Cell, 9, 393
  22. 2002, Plant Cell, 14, 969, 10.1105/tpc.002196 · DOI
  23. 1995, Methods Cell Biol., 49, 217, 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61456-9 · DOI
  24. 2000, Cell, 100, 635, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80700-X · DOI
  25. 1995, Plant Cell, 7, 1249
  26. 1990, Plant Cell, 2, 755
  27. 1999, Plant Cell, 11, 393, 10.1105/tpc.11.3.393 · DOI
  28. 1990, Nature, 346, 35, 10.1038/346035a0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 88

Metadata

Authors
Carles, C. C., Lertpiriyapong, K., Reville, K., & Fletcher, J. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, Jennifer C
Venue
Genetics
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
167
Issue
4
Pages
1893-1903
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2167143012
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
WUSCHEL, shoot apical meristem, floral meristem determinacy, inflorescence meristem, epistasis, transcriptional repression, Arabidopsis thaliana
MeSH terms
Transcription Factors, Arabidopsis, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Meristem, Plant Shoots, Microscopy, Confocal, Arabidopsis Proteins, Flowers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review