The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans's Transcriptional Response to Ionizing Radiation and Desiccation Reveals Novel Proteins That Contribute to Extreme Radioresistance
Open accessAbstract
During the first hour after a sublethal dose of ionizing radiation, 72 genes were upregulated threefold or higher in D. radiodurans R1. Thirty-three of these loci were also among a set of 73 genes expressed in R1 cultures recovering from desiccation. The five transcripts most highly induced in response to each stress are the same and encode proteins of unknown function. The genes (ddrA, ddrB, ddrC, ddrD, and pprA) corresponding to these transcripts were deleted, both alone and in all possible two-way combinations. Characterization of the mutant strains defines three epistasis groups that reflect different cellular responses to ionizing radiation-induced damage. The ddrA and ddrB gene products have complementary activities and inactivating both loci generates a strain that is more sensitive to ionizing radiation than strains in which either single gene has been deleted. These proteins appear to mediate efficient RecA-independent processes connected to ionizing radiation resistance. The pprA gene product is not necessary for homologous recombination during natural transformation, but nevertheless may participate in a RecA-dependent process during recovery from radiation damage. These characterizations clearly demonstrate that novel mechanisms significantly contribute to the ionizing radiation resistance in D. radiodurans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mattimore, V, & Battista, J. R. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.3.633-637.1996 · Cited by 687
Self-citationMoskovitz, J., Rahman, M. A., Strassman, J., Yancey, S. O., Kushner, S. R., Brot, N., & Weissbach, H. (1995) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.177.3.502-507.1995 · Cited by 294
Cited by
Oxidative Stress Resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans
Slade, D., & Radman, M. (2011) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00015-10 · Cited by 761
de Groot, A., Roche, D., Fernandez, B., Ludanyi, M., Cruveiller, S., Pignol, D., Vallenet, D., Armengaud, J., & Blanchard, L. (2014) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evu069 · Cited by 72
Basal DNA repair machinery is subject to positive selection in ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria
Sghaier, H., Ghedira, K., Benkahla, A., & Barkallah, I. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-297 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanaka, M., Earl, A. M., Howell, H. A., Park, M.-J., Eisen, J. A., Peterson, S. N., & Battista, J. R.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-33
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2141891445
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans's Transcriptional Response to Ionizing Radiation and Desiccation Reveals Novel Proteins That Contribute to Extreme Radioresistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.029249
- The paper
- Tanaka, M., Earl, A. M., Howell, H. A., Park, M.-J., Eisen, J. A., Peterson, S. N., & Battista, J. R. (2004). Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans's Transcriptional Response to Ionizing Radiation and Desiccation Reveals Novel Proteins That Contribute to Extreme Radioresistance. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.029249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.