The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomewide Nonadditive Gene Regulation in Arabidopsis Allotetraploids
Open accessAbstract
Polyploidy has occurred throughout the evolutionary history of all eukaryotes and is extremely common in plants. Reunification of the evolutionarily divergent genomes in allopolyploids creates regulatory incompatibilities that must be reconciled. Here we report genomewide gene expression analysis of Arabidopsis synthetic allotetraploids, using spotted 70-mer oligo-gene microarrays. We detected >15% transcriptome divergence between the progenitors, and 2105 and 1818 genes were highly expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana and A. arenosa, respectively. Approximately 5.2% (1362) and 5.6% (1469) genes displayed expression divergence from the midparent value (MPV) in two independently derived synthetic allotetraploids, suggesting nonadditive gene regulation following interspecific hybridization. Remarkably, the majority of nonadditively expressed genes in the allotetraploids also display expression changes between the parents, indicating that transcriptome divergence is reconciled during allopolyploid formation. Moreover, >65% of the nonadditively expressed genes in the allotetraploids are repressed, and >94% of the repressed genes in the allotetraploids match the genes that are expressed at higher levels in A. thaliana than in A. arenosa, consistent with the silencing of A. thaliana rRNA genes subjected to nucleolar dominance and with overall suppression of the A. thaliana phenotype in the synthetic allotetraploids and natural A. suecica. The nonadditive gene regulation is involved in various biological pathways, and the changes in gene expression are developmentally regulated. In contrast to the small effects of genome doubling on gene regulation in autotetraploids, the combination of two divergent genomes in allotetraploids by interspecific hybridization induces genomewide nonadditive gene regulation, providing a molecular basis for de novo variation and allopolyploid evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713 · Cited by 11,220
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Chromosomal evolution in higher plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,074
The Significance of Responses of the Genome to Challenge
McClintock, B. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.15739260 · Cited by 2,617
PATHWAYS, MECHANISMS, AND RATES OF POLYPLOID FORMATION IN FLOWERING PLANTS
Ramsey, J., & Schemske, D. W. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467 · Cited by 1,934
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
The Probability of Duplicate Gene Preservation by Subfunctionalization
Lynch, M., & Force, A. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/154.1.459 · Cited by 1,550
Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation
Queitsch, C., Sangster, T. A., & Lindquist, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature749 · Cited by 1,372
Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms
Masterson, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.264.5157.421 · Cited by 1,176
Cited by
The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid
Comai, L. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1711 · Cited by 2,287
Self-citationGene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants
Flagel, L. E., & Wendel, J. F. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x · Cited by 969
Freeling, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092122 · Cited by 1,015
The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions
te Beest, M., Le Roux, J. J., Richardson, D. M., Brysting, A. K., Suda, J., Kubesova, M., & Pysek, P. (2012) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcr277 · Cited by 911
Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss
Schnable, J. C., Springer, N. M., & Freeling, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101368108 · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Tian, L., Lee, H.-S., Wei, N. E., Jiang, H., Watson, B., Madlung, A., Osborn, T. C., Doerge, R. W., Comai, L., & Chen, Z. J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 507-517
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2153574607
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomewide Nonadditive Gene Regulation in Arabidopsis Allotetraploids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.105.047894
- The paper
- Wang, J., Tian, L., Lee, H.-S., Wei, N. E., Jiang, H., Watson, B., Madlung, A., Osborn, T. C., Doerge, R. W., Comai, L., & Chen, Z. J. (2006). Genomewide Nonadditive Gene Regulation in Arabidopsis Allotetraploids. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.