CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hybridization in Large-Bodied New World Primates

Cortés-Ortiz, Liliana, Duda, Thomas F, Canales-Espinosa, Domingo, García-Orduña, Francisco, Rodríguez-Luna, Ernesto, Bermingham, Eldredge·2007·Genetics
DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.074278
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Well-documented cases of natural hybridization among primates are not common. In New World primates, natural hybridization has been reported only for small-bodied species, but no genotypic data have ever been gathered that confirm these reports. Here we present genetic evidence of hybridization of two large-bodied species of neotropical primates that diverged ∼3 MYA. We used species-diagnostic mitochondrial and microsatellite loci and the Y chromosome Sry gene to determine the hybrid status of 36 individuals collected from an area of sympatry in Tabasco, Mexico. Thirteen individuals were hybrids. We show that hybridization and subsequent backcrosses are directionally biased and that the only likely cross between parental species produces fertile hybrid females, but fails to produce viable or fertile males. This system can be used as a model to study gene interchange between primate species that have not achieved complete reproductive isolation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.107.074278

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 2006, Zoology, 109, 261, 10.1016/j.zool.2006.03.006 · DOI
  2. 2001, Mol. Ecol., 10, 551, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x · DOI
  3. 1997, Am. J. Primatol., 43, 181, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)43:3<181::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  4. 2003, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 26, 64, 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00308-1 · DOI
  5. 1997, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 593, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.593 · DOI
  6. 1974, J. Hum. Evol., 3, 187, 10.1016/0047-2484(74)90176-6 · DOI
  7. 1998, Mol. Ecol., 7, 657, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1998.00340.x · DOI
  8. 2000, Mol. Ecol., 9, 107, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00764.x · DOI
  9. 2001, Evolution, 55, 1686, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00688.x · DOI
  10. 1999, Genetics, 152, 355, 10.1093/genetics/152.1.355 · DOI
  11. 1978, Primates, 19, 1, 10.1007/BF02373224 · DOI
  12. 1922, J. Genet., 12, 101, 10.1007/BF02983075 · DOI
  13. 1997, Int. J. Primatol., 18, 597, 10.1023/A:1026367307470 · DOI
  14. 1933, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 75, 313
  15. 2005, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2, 229
  16. 1997, Neotrop. Primates, 5, 6, 10.62015/np.1997.v5.367 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2002, J. Mol. Evol., 55, 92, 10.1007/s00239-001-2308-7 · DOI
  18. 1996, Folia Primatol., 67, 113, 10.1159/000157213 · DOI
  19. 1986, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 71, 337, 10.1002/ajpa.1330710309 · DOI
  20. 1986, Int. J. Primatol., 7, 131, 10.1007/BF02692314 · DOI
  21. 1993, Am. J. Primatol., 29, 183, 10.1002/ajp.1350290304 · DOI
  22. 1970, J. Mammal., 51, 358, 10.2307/1378486 · DOI
  23. 2001, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 50, 61, 10.1007/s002650100329 · DOI
  24. 1991, Primates, 32, 365, 10.1007/BF02382677 · DOI
  25. 1995, Int. J. Primatol., 16, 121, 10.1007/BF02700156 · DOI
  26. 1993, Nature, 364, 713, 10.1038/364713a0 · DOI
  27. 2002, Am. J. Primatol., 67, 51

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cortés-Ortiz, L., Duda, T. F., Canales-Espinosa, D., García-Orduña, F., Rodríguez-Luna, E., & Bermingham, E.
Venue
Genetics
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
176
Issue
4
Pages
2421-2425
ISSN
1943-2631
DOI
10.1534/genetics.107.074278
Cited by
90
References
0
Language
en
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review