Cited by 480Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The Genome Architecture of the Collaborative Cross Mouse Genetic Reference Population

Open access
Collaborative Cross Consortium·2012·Genetics

Abstract

The Collaborative Cross Consortium reports here on the development of a unique genetic resource population. The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a multiparental recombinant inbred panel derived from eight laboratory mouse inbred strains. Breeding of the CC lines was initiated at multiple international sites using mice from The Jackson Laboratory. Currently, this innovative project is breeding independent CC lines at the University of North Carolina (UNC), at Tel Aviv University (TAU), and at Geniad in Western Australia (GND). These institutions aim to make publicly available the completed CC lines and their genotypes and sequence information. We genotyped, and report here, results from 458 extant lines from UNC, TAU, and GND using a custom genotyping array with 7500 SNPs designed to be maximally informative in the CC and used a novel algorithm to infer inherited haplotypes directly from hybridization intensity patterns. We identified lines with breeding errors and cousin lines generated by splitting incipient lines into two or more cousin lines at early generations of inbreeding. We then characterized the genome architecture of 350 genetically independent CC lines. Results showed that founder haplotypes are inherited at the expected frequency, although we also consistently observed highly significant transmission ratio distortion at specific loci across all three populations. On chromosome 2, there is significant overrepresentation of WSB/EiJ alleles, and on chromosome X, there is a large deficit of CC lines with CAST/EiJ alleles. Linkage disequilibrium decays as expected and we saw no evidence of gametic disequilibrium in the CC population as a whole or in random subsets of the population. Gametic equilibrium in the CC population is in marked contrast to the gametic disequilibrium present in a large panel of classical inbred strains. Finally, we discuss access to the CC population and to the associated raw data describing the genetic structure of individual lines. Integration of rich phenotypic and genomic data over time and across a wide variety of fields will be vital to delivering on one of the key attributes of the CC, a common genetic reference platform for identifying causative variants and genetic networks determining traits in mammals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.111.132639

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Aylor D. L. Valdar W. Foulds-Mathes W. Buus R. J. Verdugo R. A., 2011 Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res. 21: 1213– 1222 21406540 PMC3149489
  2. Ayroles J. F. Carbone M. A. Stone E. A. Jordan K. W. Lyman R. F., 2009 Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 41: 299– 307 19234471 PMC2752214
  3. Bailey D. W., 1971 Recombinant-inbred strains: an aid to finding identity, linkage, and function of histocompatibility and other genes. Transplantation 11: 325– 327 5558564
  4. Bennett B. J. Farber C. R. Orozco L. Kang H. M. Ghazalpour A., 2010 A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. Genome Res. 20: 281– 290 20054062 PMC2813484
  5. Broman K. W., 2005 The genomes of recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 169: 1133– 1146 15545647 PMC1449115
  6. Broman, K. W., 2012a Genotype probabilities at intermediate generations in the construction of recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 190: 403–412 PMC3276635 22345609
  7. Broman, K. W., 2012b Haplotype probabilities in advanced intercross populations. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 2: 199–202 PMC3284327 22384398
  8. Buckler E. S. Holland J. B. Bradbury P. J. Acharya C. B. Brown P. J., 2009 The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325: 714– 718 19661422
  9. Burgess-Herbert S. L. Tsaih S. W. Stylianou I. M. Walsh K. Co A. J., 2009 An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice. BMC Genet. 10: 81 20003225 PMC2797012
  10. Chesler E. J. Lu L. Wang J. Williams R. W. Manly K. F., 2004 WebQTL: rapid exploratory analysis of gene expression and genetic networks for brain and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 7: 485– 486 15114364
  11. Chesler E. J. Miller D. R. Branstetter L. R. Galloway L. D. Jackson B. L., 2008 The Collaborative Cross at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: developing a powerful resource for systems genetics. Mamm. Genome 19: 382– 389 18716833 PMC2745091
  12. Churchill G. A. Airey D. C. Allayee H. Angel J. M. Attie A. D., 2004 The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat. Genet. 36: 1133– 1137 15514660
  13. Crow J. F., 2007 Haldane, Bailey, Taylor and recombinant-inbred lines. Genetics 176: 729– 732 17579238 PMC1894602
  14. Cubillos F. A. Billi E. Zörgö E. Parts L. Fargier P., 2011 Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol. Ecol. 20: 1401– 1413 21261765
  15. Demant P. Hart A. A., 1986 Recombinant congenic strains: a new tool for analyzing genetic traits determined by more than one gene. Immunogenetics 24: 416– 422 3793154
  16. Durrant C. Tayem H. Yalcin B. Cleak J. Goodstadt L., 2011 Collaborative Cross mice and their power to map host susceptibility to Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Genome Res. 21: 1239– 1248 21493779 PMC3149491
  17. Eversley C. D. Clark T. Xie Y. Steigerwalt J. Bell T. A., 2010 Genetic mapping and developmental timing of transmission ratio distortion in a mouse interspecific backcross. BMC Genet. 11: 98 21044349 PMC2992037
  18. Gong, Y., and F. Zou, 2012 Varying coefficient models for mapping quantitative trait loci using recombinant inbred intercrosses. Genetics 190: 475–486 PMC3276639 22345613
  19. Hudgins C. C. Steinberg R. T. Klinman D. M. Reeves M. J. Steinberg A. D., 1985 Studies of consomic mice bearing the Y chromosome of the BXSB mouse. J. Immunol. 134: 3849– 3854 3989299
  20. Hudson R. Kaplan N., 1985 Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111: 147– 164 4029609 PMC1202594
  21. Iraqi F. A. Churchill G. Mott R., 2008 The Collaborative Cross, developing a resource for mammalian systems genetics: a status report of the Wellcome Trust cohort. Mamm. Genome 19: 379– 381 18521666
  22. Kang H. M. Zaitlen N. A. Wade C. M. Kirby A. Heckerman D., 2008 Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178: 1709– 1723 18385116 PMC2278096
  23. Keane T. M. Goodstadt L. Danecek P. White M. A. Wong K., 2011 Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289– 294 21921910 PMC3276836
  24. Kelada, S. N. P., D. L. Aylor, B. C. E. Peck, J. F. Ryan, U. Tavarez et al., 2012 Genetic analysis of hematological parameters in incipient lines of the Collaborative Cross. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 2: 157–165 PMC3284323 22384394
  25. Kover P. X. Valdar W. Trakalo J. Scarcelli N. Ehrenreich I. M., 2009 A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000551 19593375 PMC2700969
  26. Lenarcic, A. B., K. L. Svenson, G. A. Churchill, and W. Valdar, 2012 A general Bayesian approach to analyzing diallel crosses of inbred strains. Genetics 190: 413–435 PMC3276624 22345610
  27. Liu E. Y. Zhan Q. McMillan L. de Villena F. P. Wang W., 2010 Efficient genome ancestry inference in complex pedigrees with inbreeding. Bioinformatics 26: 199– 207 PMC2881372 20529906
  28. Manenti G. Galvan A. Pettinicchio A. Trincucci G. Spada E., 2009 Mouse genome-wide association mapping needs linkage analysis to avoid false-positive Loci. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000331 19132132 PMC2614123
  29. Mathes W. Aylor D. Miller D. Churchill G. Chesler E., 2010 Architecture of energy balance traits in emerging lines of the Collaborative Cross. Am. J. Physiol. 300: E1124– E1134 PMC3118585 21427413
  30. Mihola O. Trachtulec Z. Vlcek C. Schimenti J. C. Forejt J., 2009 A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373– 375 19074312
  31. Morahan G. Balmer L. Monley D., 2008 Establishment of “The Gene Mine”: a resource for rapid identification of complex trait genes. Mamm. Genome 19: 390– 393 18716834
  32. Mott R. Talbot C. J. Turri M. G. Collins A. C. Flint J., 2000 A method for fine-mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 12649– 12654 11050180 PMC18818
  33. Nadeau J. H. Singer J. B. Matin A. Lander E. S., 2000 Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat. Genet. 24: 221– 225 10700173
  34. Paigen K. Eppig J. T., 2000 A mouse phenome project. Mamm. Genome 11: 715– 717 10967127
  35. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F. Sapienza C., 2001 Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm. Genome 12: 331– 339 Review 11331939
  36. Payseur B. A. Krenz J. G. Nachman M. W., 2005 Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mice. Evolution 58: 2064– 2078 15521462
  37. Petkov P. M. Graber J. H. Churchill G. A. DiPetrillo K. King B. L., 2005 Evidence of a large-scale functional organization of mammalian chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 1: e33 16163395 PMC1201368
  38. Roberts A. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F. Wang W. McMillan L. Threadgill D., 2007 The polymorphism architecture of mouse genetic resources elucidated using genome-wide resequencing data. Mamm. Genome 18: 473– 481 17674098 PMC1998888
  39. Sun, W., S. Lee, V. Zhabotynsky, F. Zou, F. A. Wright, 2012 Transcriptome atlases of mouse brain reveals differential expression across brain regions and genetic backgrounds. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 2: 203–211 PMC3284328 22384399
  40. Svenson, K. L., D. M. Gatti, W. Valdar, C. E. Welsh, R. Cheng et al., 2012 High resolution genetic mapping using the mouse Diversity Outbred population. Genetics 190: 437–447 PMC3276626 22345611
  41. Taylor B. A. Meier H. Myers D. D., 1971 Host-gene control of C-type RNA tumor virus: inheritance of the group-specific antigen of murine leukemia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68: 3190– 3194 4332013 PMC389619
  42. Teuscher F. Broman K. W., 2007 Haplotype probabilities for multiple-strain recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 175: 1267– 1274 17151250 PMC1840090
  43. Threadgill D. W., 2006 Meeting report for the 4th annual Complex Trait Consortium meeting: from QTLs to systems genetics. Mamm. Genome 17: 2– 4 16416085
  44. Threadgill D. W. Hunter K. W. Williams R. W., 2002 Genetic dissection of complex and quantitative traits: from fantasy to reality via a community effort. Mamm. Genome 13: 175– 178 11956758
  45. Threadgill D. W. Miller D. R. Churchill G. A. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F., 2011 The Collaborative Cross: recombinant inbred panels in the systems genetics era. ILAR J. 52: 24– 31 21411855
  46. Valdar W. Flint J. Mott R., 2006 Simulating the collaborative cross: power of quantitative trait loci detection and mapping resolution in large sets of recombinant inbred strains of mice. Genetics 172: 1783– 1797 16361245 PMC1456308
  47. Wang J. Williams R. W. Manly K. F., 2003 WebQTL: web-based complex trait analysis. Neuroinformatics 1: 299– 308 15043217
  48. Wang J. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F. Moore K. J. Wang W. Zhang Q., 2010 Genome-wide compatible SNP intervals and their properties. Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Niagara Falls, NY PMC5690570 29152612
  49. Wang J. Pardo-Manuel Villena F. McMillan L., 2011 Dynamic visualization and comparative analysis of multiple collinear genomic data. Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Chicago, IL PMC5672797 29119144
  50. Wang, J. R., F. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, H. A. Lawson, J. M. Cheverud, G. A. Churchill et al., 2012 Imputation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in inbred mice using local phylogeny. Genetics 190: 449–458 PMC3276610 22345612
  51. Welsh, C. E., and L. McMillan, 2012 Accelerating the inbreeding of multi-parental recombinant inbred lines generated by sibling matings. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 2: 191–198 PMC3284326 22384397
  52. White M. A. Steffy B. Wiltshire T. Payseur B. A., 2011 Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice. Genetics 189: 289– 304 21750261 PMC3176122
  53. Yang H. Bell T. A. Churchill G. A. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F., 2007 On the origin of the laboratory mouse. Nat. Genet. 39: 1100– 1107 17660819
  54. Yang H. Ding Y. Hutchins L. N. Szatkiewicz J. Bell T. A., 2009 A customized and versatile high-density genotyping array for the mouse. Nat. Methods 6: 663– 666 19668205 PMC2735580
  55. Yang H. Wang J. R. Didion J. P. Buus R. J. Bell T. A., 2011 Genome-wide maps of subspecific origin and identity by descent in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Genet. 43: 648– 655 21623374 PMC3125408
  56. Zhang Q. Wang W. McMillan L. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F. Threadgill D., 2009 Inferring genome-wide mosaic structure. Proc. PSB 14: 150– 161 PMC2736068 19209700
  57. Zhang, Z., X. Zhang, and W. Wang, 2012 HTreeQA: using semi-perfect phylogeny trees in quantitative trait loci study on genotype data. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 2: 175–189 PMC3284325 22384396

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collaborative Cross Consortium
Corresponding author
Collaborative Cross Consortium
Venue
Genetics
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
190
Issue
2
Pages
389-401
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W4300609576
Cited by
480
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 37
FWCI
27.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HZI (Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research) (submittedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0448392, 0812464)
  • Ellison Medical Foundation (AG-IA-0202-05)
  • Wellcome Trust (085906/Z/08/Z, 090532, 083573/Z/07/Z, 090532/Z/09/Z, 083573/Z/07)
  • National Institutes of Health (U42OD010924)
  • Australian Research Council
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH090338)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG006582)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA134240)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM070683, R01GM074175, F32GM090667)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U54AI081680, U19AI100625)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Collaborative Cross, haplotype inference, segregation distortion, linkage disequilibrium, gametic disequilibrium, founder haplotype, SNP genotyping array
MeSH terms
Animals, Breeding, Crosses, Genetic, Female, Genotype, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Reproduction, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Founder Effect, Mice, Extinction, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review