Cited by 753Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The “Domestication Syndrome” in Mammals: A Unified Explanation Based on Neural Crest Cell Behavior and Genetics

Open access

Abstract

Charles Darwin, while trying to devise a general theory of heredity from the observations of animal and plant breeders, discovered that domesticated mammals possess a distinctive and unusual suite of heritable traits not seen in their wild progenitors. Some of these traits also appear in domesticated birds and fish. The origin of Darwin’s “domestication syndrome” has remained a conundrum for more than 140 years. Most explanations focus on particular traits, while neglecting others, or on the possible selective factors involved in domestication rather than the underlying developmental and genetic causes of these traits. Here, we propose that the domestication syndrome results predominantly from mild neural crest cell deficits during embryonic development. Most of the modified traits, both morphological and physiological, can be readily explained as direct consequences of such deficiencies, while other traits are explicable as indirect consequences. We first show how the hypothesis can account for the multiple, apparently unrelated traits of the syndrome and then explore its genetic dimensions and predictions, reviewing the available genetic evidence. The article concludes with a brief discussion of some genetic and developmental questions raised by the idea, along with specific predictions and experimental tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.114.165423

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 114 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Arbuckle, 2005, Experimental animal domestication and its application to the study of animal exploitation in Prehistory
  2. Belyaev, 1974, Domestication, plant and animal, 936
  3. Belyaev, 1984, Foxes, 211
  4. Belyaev, 1989, The convergent nature of incipient forms and the concept of destabilizing selection, 155
  5. Darwin, 1859, On the Origin of Species
  6. Darwin, 1868, Variation in Animals and Plants under Domestication
  7. Kruska, 1988, Mammalian domestication and its effects on brain structure and behavior, 211, 10.1007/978-3-642-70877-0_13 · DOI
  8. Trut, 1991, Intracranial allometry and morphological changes in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) under domestication, Genetika, 27, 1605

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–753 of 753

Metadata

Authors
Wilkins, A. S., Wrangham, R. W., & Fitch, W. T.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Wilkins, Adam S
Venue
Genetics
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
197
Issue
3
Pages
795-808
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2165155571
Cited by
751
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (230604)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
domestication syndrome, neural crest cells, embryonic development, developmental genetics, heritable traits
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Behavior, Animal, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Neural Crest, Syndrome, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review