The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Marker-Free Recovery of Custom Genetic Modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans
Open accessAbstract
Facilitated by recent advances using CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing technologies now permit custom genetic modifications in a wide variety of organisms. Ideally, modified animals could be both efficiently made and easily identified with minimal initial screening and without introducing exogenous sequence at the locus of interest or marker mutations elsewhere. To this end, we describe a coconversion strategy, using CRISPR/Cas9 in which screening for a dominant phenotypic oligonucleotide-templated conversion event at one locus can be used to enrich for custom modifications at another unlinked locus. After the desired mutation is identified among the F1 progeny heterozygous for the dominant marker mutation, F2 animals that have lost the marker mutation are picked to obtain the desired mutation in an unmarked genetic background. We have developed such a coconversion strategy for Caenorhabditis elegans, using a number of dominant phenotypic markers. Examining the coconversion at a second (unselected) locus of interest in the marked F1 animals, we observed that 14–84% of screened animals showed homologous recombination. By reconstituting the unmarked background through segregation of the dominant marker mutation at each step, we show that custom modification events can be carried out recursively, enabling multiple mutant animals to be made. While our initial choice of a coconversion marker [rol-6(su1006)] was readily applicable in a single round of coconversion, the genetic properties of this locus were not optimal in that CRISPR-mediated deletion mutations at the unselected rol-6 locus can render a fraction of coconverted strains recalcitrant to further rounds of similar mutagenesis. An optimal marker in this sense would provide phenotypic distinctions between the desired mutant/+ class and alternative +/+, mutant/null, null/null, and null/+ genotypes. Reviewing dominant alleles from classical C. elegans genetics, we identified one mutation in dpy-10 and one mutation in sqt-1 that meet these criteria and demonstrate that these too can be used as effective conversion markers. Coconversion was observed using a variety of donor molecules at the second (unselected) locus, including oligonucleotides, PCR products, and plasmids. We note that the coconversion approach described here could be applied in any of the variety of systems where suitable coconversion markers can be identified from previous intensive genetic analyses of gain-of-function alleles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2508 · Cited by 2,429
Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system
Friedland, A. E., Tzur, Y. B., Esvelt, K. M., Colaiácovo, M. P., Church, G. M., & Calarco, J. A. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2532 · Cited by 899
Cited by
Streamlined Genome Engineering with a Self-Excising Drug Selection Cassette
Dickinson, D. J., Pani, A. M., Heppert, J. K., Higgins, C. D., & Goldstein, B. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.178335 · Cited by 586
Shen, E.-Z., Chen, H., Ozturk, A. R., Tu, S., Shirayama, M., Tang, W., Ding, Y.-H., Dai, S.-Y., Weng, Z., & Mello, C. C. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.002 · Cited by 226
Spatiotemporal regulation of liquid-like condensates in epigenetic inheritance
Wan, G., Fields, B. D., Spracklin, G., Shukla, A., Phillips, C. M., & Kennedy, S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0132-0 · Cited by 207
Kitchen, S., Ratnappan, R., Han, S., Leasure, C., Grill, E., Iqbal, Z., Granger, O., O'Halloran, D. M., & Hawdon, J. M. (2019) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.12.004 · Cited by 105
BORC Regulates the Axonal Transport of Synaptic Vesicle Precursors by Activating ARL-8
Niwa, S., Tao, L., Lu, S. Y., Liew, G. M., Feng, W., Nachury, M. V., & Shen, K. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.013 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Arribere, J. A., Bell, R. T., Fu, B. X. H., Artiles, K. L., Hartman, P. S., & Fire, A. Z.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-26
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 837-846
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2140341433
- Cited by
- 794
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Marker-Free Recovery of Custom Genetic Modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.114.169730
- The paper
- Arribere, J. A., Bell, R. T., Fu, B. X. H., Artiles, K. L., Hartman, P. S., & Fire, A. Z. (2014). Efficient Marker-Free Recovery of Custom Genetic Modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.169730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.