The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive
Open accessAbstract
CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive (CGD) promises to be a highly adaptable approach for spreading genetically engineered alleles throughout a species, even if those alleles impair reproductive success. CGD has been shown to be effective in laboratory crosses of insects, yet it remains unclear to what extent potential resistance mechanisms will affect the dynamics of this process in large natural populations. Here we develop a comprehensive population genetic framework for modeling CGD dynamics, which incorporates potential resistance mechanisms as well as random genetic drift. Using this framework, we calculate the probability that resistance against CGD evolves from standing genetic variation, de novo mutation of wild-type alleles, or cleavage repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)—a likely by-product of CGD itself. We show that resistance to standard CGD approaches should evolve almost inevitably in most natural populations, unless repair of CGD-induced cleavage via NHEJ can be effectively suppressed, or resistance costs are on par with those of the driver. The key factor determining the probability that resistance evolves is the overall rate at which resistance alleles arise at the population level by mutation or NHEJ. By contrast, the conversion efficiency of the driver, its fitness cost, and its introduction frequency have only minor impact. Our results shed light on strategies that could facilitate the engineering of drivers with lower resistance potential, and motivate the possibility to embrace resistance as a possible mechanism for controlling a CGD approach. This study highlights the need for careful modeling of the population dynamics of CGD prior to the actual release of a driver construct into the wild.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292
Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering
Zhang, X.-H., Tee, L. Y., Wang, X.-G., Huang, Q.-S., & Yang, S.-H. (2015) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2015.37 · Cited by 1,273
ON THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF MUTANT GENES IN A POPULATION
Kimura, M. (1962) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/47.6.713 · Cited by 1,208
Hammond, A., Galizi, R., Kyrou, K., Simoni, A., Siniscalchi, C., Katsanos, D., Gribble, M., Baker, D., Marois, E., Russell, S., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3439 · Cited by 1,165
Hermisson (2005) · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.036947 · Cited by 1,009
Gantz, V. M., Jasinskiene, N., Tatarenkova, O., Fazekas, A., Macias, V. M., Bier, E., & James, A. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521077112 · Cited by 956
Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations
Esvelt, K. M., Smidler, A. L., Catteruccia, F., & Church, G. M. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.03401 · Cited by 856
Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system
Bondy-Denomy, J., Pawluk, A., Maxwell, K. L., & Davidson, A. R. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11723 · Cited by 830
Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations
Burt, A. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2319 · Cited by 689
Cited by
The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control
Achee, N. L., Grieco, J. P., Vatandoost, H., Seixas, G., Pinto, J., Ching-NG, L., Martins, A. J., Juntarajumnong, W., Corbel, V., Gouagna, C., et al. (2019) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006822 · Cited by 353
Fungicide resistance management: Maximizing the effective life of plant protection products
Corkley, I., Fraaije, B., & Hawkins, N. (2022) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.13467 · Cited by 280
CRISPR in Animals and Animal Models
Shrock, E., & Güell, M. (2017) · Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.07.010 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Unckless, R. L., Clark, A. G., & Messer, P. W.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-01
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 827-841
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2949144539
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.116.197285
- The paper
- Unckless, R. L., Clark, A. G., & Messer, P. W. (2017). Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.197285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.