Cited by 3,292CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells

Open access
Fu, Yanfang, Foden, Jennifer A, Khayter, Cyd, Maeder, Morgan L, Reyon, Deepak, Joung, J Keith, Sander, Jeffry D·2013·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA-guided nucleases (RGNs) have rapidly emerged as a facile and efficient platform for genome editing. Here, we use a human cell-based reporter assay to characterize off-target cleavage of CRISPR-associated (Cas)9-based RGNs. We find that single and double mismatches are tolerated to varying degrees depending on their position along the guide RNA (gRNA)-DNA interface. We also readily detected off-target alterations induced by four out of six RGNs targeted to endogenous loci in human cells by examination of partially mismatched sites. The off-target sites we identified harbored up to five mismatches and many were mutagenized with frequencies comparable to (or higher than) those observed at the intended on-target site. Our work demonstrates that RGNs can be highly active even with imperfectly matched RNA-DNA interfaces in human cells, a finding that might confound their use in research and therapeutic applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.2623

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-depth studies on the outcomes of Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair have shown significant off-target effects, which resulted in substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation.

    “Moreover, in-depth studies on the outcomes of Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair have shown significant off-target effects, which resulted in substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation.”

    From Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The paper’s Abstract reports high-frequency off-target mutations in human cells, and its discussion of verified off-target sites says sequencing confirmed insertion/deletion (indel) mutations at Cas9 cleavage sites (page unavailable). Our copy does not report substitutions or DNA translocations as outcomes of those breaks; its references to substitutions and mismatches concern guide-RNA targeting, not repair outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Manipulating Cas9's biophysical attributes, such as minimizing nonspecific RNA-DNA interactions, significantly reduces off-target mutations while maintaining high on-target efficiency.

    “For example, a study demonstrated that manipulating Cas9's biophysical attributes, such as minimizing nonspecific RNA-DNA interactions, significantly reduces off-target mutations while maintaining high on-target efficiency.”

    From Hybrid Neural Networks for Off-Target Prediction in Gene Editing: Integrating Sequence and Biophysical Features (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The discussion of RNA:DNA hybrid stability (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) says its effect on off-target specificity needs further experiments; it does not report a successful intervention. The paper also reports that lowering guide-RNA and Cas9 expression reduced on-target mutation rates without appreciably changing relative off-target rates, but that is a different intervention from altering Cas9’s biophysical attributes. No passage establishes the claimed reduction in off-target mutations while maintaining high on-target efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A study reported high-frequency off-target mutagenesis in transduced human cell lines after SpCas9 delivery.

    “A study reported highfrequency off-target mutagenesis in transduced human cell lines after SpCas9 delivery [108].”
  • Transient Cas9 expression by mRNA delivery can substantially reduce off-target genome editing in cells compared with long-term viral Cas9 expression.

    “Using a VEGFA sgRNA with well-characterized off-target sites24, we observed that transient Cas9 expression by mRNA delivery can substantially reduce off-target genome editing in cells (Fig. 1f–h).”
  • Cas9 tolerates mismatches between the guide RNA and target DNA in a sequence-dependent manner and potentially tolerates up to five target mismatches in human cells, thereby promoting undesired off-target mutations.

    “as mentioned in several recent publications, Cas9 tolerates mismatches between the guide RNA and target DNA in a sequence-dependent manner and potentially tolerates up to five target mismatches in human cells [12], [24], [25], [26], [27], thereby promoting undesired off-target mutations.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Joung, J Keith
  • Sander, Jeffry D
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2013-06-23
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
822-826
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2077659966
Cited by
3,292
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 246 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 280 · 2019: 274 · 2018: 278 · 2017: 269 · 2016: 314 · 2015: 254 · 2014: 291 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 2
FWCI
141.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG005550)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DP1GM105378, R01GM088040)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (DP1 GM105378)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target cleavage, RNA-guided nucleases, mismatch tolerance, genome editing, mutagenesis, human cells, off-target sites
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Endonucleases, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, K562 Cells, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review