Ancestral reconstruction of karyotypes reveals an exceptional rate of nonrandom chromosomal evolution in sunflower
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Mapping the chromosomal rearrangements between species can inform our understanding of genome evolution, reproductive isolation, and speciation. Here, we present a novel algorithm for identifying regions of synteny in pairs of genetic maps, which is implemented in the accompanying R package syntR. The syntR algorithm performs as well as previous ad hoc methods while being systematic, repeatable, and applicable to mapping chromosomal rearrangements in any group of species. In addition, we present a systematic survey of chromosomal rearrangements in the annual sunflowers, which is a group known for extreme karyotypic diversity. We build high-density genetic maps for two subspecies of the prairie sunflower, Helianthus petiolaris ssp. petiolaris and H. petiolaris ssp. fallax. Using syntR, we identify blocks of synteny between these two subspecies and previously published high-density genetic maps. We reconstruct ancestral karyotypes for annual sunflowers using those synteny blocks and conservatively estimate that there have been 7.9 chromosomal rearrangements per million years, a high rate of chromosomal evolution. Although the rate of inversion is even higher than the rate of translocation in this group, we further find that every extant karyotype is distinguished by between one and three translocations involving only 8 of the 17 chromosomes. This nonrandom exchange suggests that specific chromosomes are prone to translocation and may thus contribute disproportionately to widespread hybrid sterility in sunflowers. These data deepen our understanding of chromosome evolution and confirm that Helianthus has an exceptional rate of chromosomal rearrangement that may facilitate similarly rapid diversification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observations of high rates of translocations in species with very large effective population sizes are inconsistent with an important role of drift in translocation establishment.
“Observations of high rates of translocations in species with very large effective population sizes are also inconsistent with an important role of drift in translocation establishment (Strasburg et al., 2011; Ostevik et al., 2020).”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Ostevik et al., 2020
Cites
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Self-citationRecombination suppressors and the evolution of new species
Trickett, A. J., & Butlin, R. K. (1994) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1994.180 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Stathos, A., & Fishman, L. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12503 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers
Todesco, M., Owens, G. L., Bercovich, N., Légaré, J.-S., Soudi, S., Burge, D. O., Huang, K., Ostevik, K. L., Drummond, E. B. M., Imerovski, I., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2467-6 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Self-citationBock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“…were recently reported in banana (Martin et al., 2020), and several studies have associated translocation breakpoints with centromeres (Schranz et al., 2006; Badaeva et al., 2007; Ostevik et al., 2020), suggesting a possible role of female meiotic drive, but further investigation is needed.”
Self-citationChromosome reciprocal translocations have accompanied subspecies evolution in bananas
Martin, G., Baurens, F., Hervouet, C., Salmon, F., Delos, J., Labadie, K., Perdereau, A., Mournet, P., Blois, L., Dupouy, M., et al. (2020) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15031 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Owens, G. L., Todesco, M., Bercovich, N., Légaré, J., Mitchell, N., Whitney, K. D., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16008 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ostevik, K. L., Samuk, K., & Rieseberg, L. H.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ostevik, Kate L
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1031-1045
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- PMC
- PMC7153943
- OpenAlex
- W3005506214
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- chromosomal rearrangements, ancestral karyotype reconstruction, sunflower, Helianthus petiolaris, synteny mapping, translocation, chromosomal inversions, karyotypic diversity, hybrid sterility, speciation, genome evolution, genetic linkage map
- MeSH terms
- Helianthus, Polymorphism, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Chromosomes, Plant, Karyotype
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review