Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A 3347-Locus Genetic Recombination Map of Sequence-Tagged Sites Reveals Features of Genome Organization, Transmission and Evolution of Cotton (Gossypium)

Open access
Rong, Junkang, Abbey, Colette, Bowers, John E, Brubaker, Curt L, Chang, Charlene, Chee, Peng W, Delmonte, Terrye A, Ding, Xiaoling, Garza, Juan J, Marler, Barry S, Park, Chan-hwa, Pierce, Gary J, Rainey, Katy M, Rastogi, Vipin K, Schulze, Stefan R, Trolinder, Norma L, Wendel, Jonathan F, Wilkins, Thea A, Williams-Coplin, T Dawn, Wing, Rod A, Wright, Robert J, Zhao, Xinping, Zhu, Linghua, Paterson, Andrew H·2004·Genetics

Abstract

We report genetic maps for diploid (D) and tetraploid (AtDt) Gossypium genomes composed of sequence-tagged sites (STS) that foster structural, functional, and evolutionary genomic studies. The maps include, respectively, 2584 loci at 1.72-cM (∼600 kb) intervals based on 2007 probes (AtDt) and 763 loci at 1.96-cM (∼500 kb) intervals detected by 662 probes (D). Both diploid and tetraploid cottons exhibit negative crossover interference; i.e., double recombinants are unexpectedly abundant. We found no major structural changes between Dt and D chromosomes, but confirmed two reciprocal translocations between At chromosomes and several inversions. Concentrations of probes in corresponding regions of the various genomes may represent centromeres, while genome-specific concentrations may represent heterochromatin. Locus duplication patterns reveal all 13 expected homeologous chromosome sets and lend new support to the possibility that a more ancient polyploidization event may have predated the A-D divergence of 6–11 million years ago. Identification of SSRs within 312 RFLP sequences plus direct mapping of 124 SSRs and exploration for CAPS and SNPs illustrate the “portability” of these STS loci across populations and detection systems useful for marker-assisted improvement of the world's leading fiber crop. These data provide new insights into polyploid evolution and represent a foundation for assembly of a finished sequence of the cotton genome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.166.1.389

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Rong, J., Abbey, C., Bowers, J. E., Brubaker, C. L., Chang, C., Chee, P. W., Delmonte, T. A., Ding, X., Garza, J. J., Marler, B. S., Park, C.-H., Pierce, G. J., Rainey, K. M., Rastogi, V. K., Schulze, S. R., Trolinder, N. L., Wendel, J. F., Wilkins, T. A., Williams-Coplin, T. D., Wing, R. A., Wright, R. J., Zhao, X., Zhu, L., & Paterson, A. H.
Venue
Genetics
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
166
Issue
1
Pages
389-417
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2097816769
Cited by
369
References
0
FWCI
28.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 3347-Locus Genetic Recombination Map of Sequence-Tagged Sites Reveals Features of Genome Organization, Transmission and Evolution of Cotton (Gossypium). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.166.1.389
The paper
Rong, J., Abbey, C., Bowers, J. E., Brubaker, C. L., Chang, C., Chee, P. W., Delmonte, T. A., Ding, X., Garza, J. J., Marler, B. S., Park, C.-H., Pierce, G. J., Rainey, K. M., Rastogi, V. K., Schulze, S. R., Trolinder, N. L., Wendel, J. F., Wilkins, T. A., Williams-Coplin, T. D., . . . Paterson, A. H. (2004). A 3347-Locus Genetic Recombination Map of Sequence-Tagged Sites Reveals Features of Genome Organization, Transmission and Evolution of Cotton (Gossypium). Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.1.389

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.