Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors
Abstract
Likelihood methods have been developed to partition individuals in a sample into full-sib and half-sib families using genetic marker data without parental information. They invariably make the critical assumption that marker data are free of genotyping errors and mutations and are thus completely reliable in inferring sibships. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is rarely tenable for virtually all kinds of genetic markers in practical use and, if violated, can severely bias sibship estimates as shown by simulations in this article. I propose a new likelihood method with simple and robust models of typing error incorporated into it. Simulations show that the new method can be used to infer full- and half-sibships accurately from marker data with a high error rate and to identify typing errors at each locus in each reconstructed sib family. The new method also improves previous ones by adopting a fresh iterative procedure for updating allele frequencies with reconstructed sibships taken into account, by allowing for the use of parental information, and by using efficient algorithms for calculating the likelihood function and searching for the maximum-likelihood configuration. It is tested extensively on simulated data with a varying number of marker loci, different rates of typing errors, and various sample sizes and family structures and applied to two empirical data sets to demonstrate its usefulness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple runs with 3 different random number seeds were performed to check/confirm software output reliability, as suggested by Wang (2004).
“Since the dataset was small and included families assumed to be very small (1 to 3 offspring per sibship), multiple runs with 3 different random number seeds were performed to check/confirm software output reliability, as suggested by Wang (2004).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Wang (2004)
Previous studies proved that the FL method is the most accurate and that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software in carrying out parentage analysis.
“Actually, previous studies proved that the FL method is the most accurate (Wang 2004(Wang , 2012;;Wang and Santure 2009) and that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software in carrying out parentage analysis (Wang 2012;Ferrie et al. 2013;Harrison et al. 2013).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Wang 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modesto, P., Biolatti, C., Favaro, L., Colussi, S., Peletto, S., Piga, S., Riina, M. V., Pessani, D., Trincas, E., Isaja, V., et al. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esy032 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, J.
- Affiliations
- Zoological Society of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1963-1979
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119232685
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- sibship reconstruction, full-sib families, half-sib families, genotyping errors, likelihood methods, marker data, allele frequency estimation
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Gene Frequency, Genetic Markers, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Research Design, Sibling Relations, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review