Cited by 946Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors

Wang, J.·2004·Genetics

Abstract

Likelihood methods have been developed to partition individuals in a sample into full-sib and half-sib families using genetic marker data without parental information. They invariably make the critical assumption that marker data are free of genotyping errors and mutations and are thus completely reliable in inferring sibships. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is rarely tenable for virtually all kinds of genetic markers in practical use and, if violated, can severely bias sibship estimates as shown by simulations in this article. I propose a new likelihood method with simple and robust models of typing error incorporated into it. Simulations show that the new method can be used to infer full- and half-sibships accurately from marker data with a high error rate and to identify typing errors at each locus in each reconstructed sib family. The new method also improves previous ones by adopting a fresh iterative procedure for updating allele frequencies with reconstructed sibships taken into account, by allowing for the use of parental information, and by using efficient algorithms for calculating the likelihood function and searching for the maximum-likelihood configuration. It is tested extensively on simulated data with a varying number of marker loci, different rates of typing errors, and various sample sizes and family structures and applied to two empirical data sets to demonstrate its usefulness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1963

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J.
Affiliations
Zoological Society of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wang, J.
Venue
Genetics
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
166
Issue
4
Pages
1963-1979
ISSN
0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119232685
Cited by
946
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 69
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
sibship reconstruction, full-sib families, half-sib families, genotyping errors, likelihood methods, marker data, allele frequency estimation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Gene Frequency, Genetic Markers, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Research Design, Sibling Relations, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review