The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments
Abstract
Stochastic mechanisms can cause a group of isogenic bacteria, each subject to identical environmental conditions, to nevertheless exhibit diverse patterns of gene expression. The resulting phenotypic subpopulations will typically have distinct growth rates. This behavior has been observed in several contexts, including sugar metabolism and pili phase variation. Under fixed environmental conditions, the net growth rate of the population is maximized when all cells are of the fastest growing phenotype, so it is unclear what fitness advantage is conferred by population heterogeneity. However, unlike ideal laboratory conditions, natural environments tend to fluctuate, either periodically or randomly. Here we use a stochastic population model to show that, during growth in such fluctuating environments, a dynamically heterogenous bacterial population can sometimes achieve a higher net growth rate than a homogenous one. By using stochastic mechanisms to sample several distinct phenotypes, the bacteria are able to anticipate and take advantage of sudden changes in their environment. However, this heterogeneity is beneficial only if the bacterial response rate is sufficiently low. Our results could be useful in the design of artificial evolution experiments and in the optimization of fermentation processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
ENZYME INDUCTION AS AN ALL-OR-NONE PHENOMENON
Novick, A., & Weiner, M. (1957) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.43.7.553 · Cited by 891
Motifs, modules and games in bacteria
Wolf, D. M., & Arkin, A. P. (2003) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00033-x · Cited by 303
Cited by
Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences
Raj, A., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050 · Cited by 2,593
Self-citationStochastic State Transitions Give Rise to Phenotypic Equilibrium in Populations of Cancer Cells
Gupta, P. B., Fillmore, C. M., Jiang, G., Shapira, S. D., Tao, K., Kuperwasser, C., & Lander, E. S. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.026 · Cited by 1,475
Microbial Cell Individuality and the Underlying Sources of Heterogeneity
Avery, S. V. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1460 · Cited by 521
Mechanism of Transcriptional Bursting in Bacteria
Chong, S., Chen, C., Ge, H., & Xie, X. S. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.038 · Cited by 428
Bet Hedging in Yeast by Heterogeneous, Age-Correlated Expression of a Stress Protectant
Levy, S. F., Ziv, N., & Siegal, M. L. (2012) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001325 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Thattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 523-530
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2096015757
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.167.1.523
- The paper
- Thattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2004). Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.167.1.523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.