The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of Pine Gasification Ash and its Effects on Chlamydomonas debaryana Growth
Open accessAbstract
Large amounts of ash, generated from biomass gasification, often contaminate syngas and the ecosystem.This study showed that the ash obtained from the gasification of pine wood was primarily composed of carbon (15% to 25%), minerals (~21%), and oxygen (52% to 63%), and exhibited low surface area (8.4 to 11.2 m 2 /g).The size of ash particles was between 600 nm and 600 μm.Calcium, potassium, and sodium were the three most common mineral elements in the ash.Leaching tests showed that adding ash to water raised the pH value from 5.7 to between 11.2 and 11.5, and, as time progressed, more mineral elements were released from the ash.For growing microalga Chlamydomonas debaryana in media containing ashes, no toxicity of pine ash was found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ash yields from biomass combustion range from 0.4 to 6%, and ash compositions vary depending on the nature of the incinerated biomass.
“The ash yields from biomass combustion range from 0.4 to 6% [73,90,91,97], and the ash compositions vary depending on the nature of the incinerated biomass [10,58].”
From Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for phytoremediation: Energy and environmental life cycle assessment of using contaminated biomass as an energy resource (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
The Introduction reports typical wood ash content of 1.1–4.8 wt.%, which supports a narrower point about ash amounts, not the claimed 0.4–6% range for biomass combustion. The Elemental analysis section characterizes pine ash and relates its calcium content to pine wood, but does not establish that ash composition varies across biomass types. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview
Kirkels, A. F., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.046 · Cited by 344
Ash Management Review—Applications of Biomass Bottom Ash
James, A., Thring, R. W., Helle, S. S., & Ghuman, H. S. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5103856 · Cited by 272
Effects of Biomass Feedstocks and Gasification Conditions on the Physiochemical Properties of Char
Qian, K., Kumar, A., V, Patil, K. N., Bellmer, D. D., Wang, D., Yuan, W. W., & Huhnke, R. L. (2013) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en6083972 · Cited by 224
Quigg, A. S., Chin, W., Chen, C., Zhang, S., Jiang, Y., Miao, A., Schwehr, K. A., Xu, C., & Santschi, P. H. (2013) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/sc400103x · Cited by 196
Pandey, V. C., Abhilash, P. C., & Singh, N. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.001 · Cited by 185
Rai, U. N., Pandey, K., Sinha, S., Singh, A., Saxena, R., & Gupta, D. K. (2003) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/s0160-4120(03)00179-x · Cited by 154
Tripathi, R. D., Dwivedi, S., Shukla, M. K., Mishra, S., Srivastava, S., Singh, R., Rai, U. N., & Gupta, D. K. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.038 · Cited by 97
Role of CeO2–ZrO2 in diesel soot oxidation and thermal stability of potassium catalyst
Wu, X., Liu, D., Li, K., Li, J. Z., & Weng, D. (2006) · Catalysis Communications · doi:10.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.022 · Cited by 64
Vocke, R. W., Sears, K. L., O'Toole, J. J., & Wildman, R. B. (1980) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(80)90230-4 · Cited by 53
Green biorefinery of fresh cattail for microalgal culture and ethanol production
Rahman, Q. M., Wang, L., Zhang, B., Xiu, S., & Shahbazi, A. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.013 · Cited by 38
Self-citationZhang, B., Wang, L., Hasan, R., & Shahbazi, A. (2014) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.9.4.6130-6140 · Cited by 24
Self-citationCharacterization of Solid Residues Obtained from Supercritical Ethanol Liquefaction of Swine Manure
Li, R., Zhang, B., Xiu, S., Wang, H., Wang, L., & Shahbazi, A. (2015) · American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · doi:10.3844/ajeassp.2015.465.470 · Cited by 23
Self-citationYan, Q., & Li, R. (2015) · Trends in Renewable Energy · doi:10.17737/tre.2015.1.2.0012 · Cited by 10
Self-citationHill, C. L. (2014) · Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Nanda, S., Kozinski, J. A., and Dalai, A. K. (2013). "Biomass -An overview on classification, composition and characterization," in: Biomass Processing, Conversion and Biorefinery, Zhang, B.,and Wang, Y. (eds.), Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, pp. 3-36.
- Ransford, B. R., Shahbazi, A., Todd, M., and Rojanala, H. (2013). "Economic analysis of waste to power: A case study of Greensboro city," in: Biomass Processing, Conversion and Biorefinery, Zhang, B., and Wang, Y. (eds.), Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, pp: 409-422.
- Silverstein, R. M., Webster, F. X., and Kiemle, D. (2005). Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 7 th Ed., John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Todde, G., Carboni, G., Marras, S., Caria, M., & Sirca, C. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102081 · Cited by 63
Maier, J. M., Sowlati, T., & Salazar, J. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.035 · Cited by 55
Sustainable Production of Algal Biomass and Biofuels Using Swine Wastewater in North Carolina, US
Zhang, B., Wang, L., Riddicka, B., Li, R., Able, J., Boakye-Boaten, N. A., & Shahbazi, A. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8050477 · Cited by 29
Self-citationAerobic treatment of swine manure to enhance anaerobic digestion and microalgal cultivation
Bekoe, D., Wang, L., Zhang, B., Todd, M. S., & Shahbazi, A. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B · doi:10.1080/03601234.2017.1397454 · Cited by 13
Self-citationNguyen, N., Khuong, D. A., Tran‐Nguyen, P. L., & Tsubota, T. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3919665 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, R., Zhang, B., Xiu, S., Wang, H., Boaten, N. A. B., Holmes, B. M., Wang, L., & Shahbazi, A.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
- Venue
- BioResources
- Publisher
- BioResources
- Published
- 2016-01-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1930-2126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2239709287
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BioResources (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1242152)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEEE0003138)
- Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- microalgae growth, ash leaching, ash mineral composition, ash particle size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
