Catastrophic Plate Tectonics and the Tectonics of Western North America
Open accessAbstract
Catastrophic Plate Tectonics (CPT) is a widely accepted theory among Young Earth Creation scientists to explain the catastrophic flooding and tectonic plate movement during the Biblical Flood. CPT has implications beyond the early stages of the Flood, as rapid subduction would result in a variety of tectonic settings that influenced modern topography. In western North America, the formation of several major tectonic features has been debated by secular scientists for decades. Using hypotheses that depend on slow tectonic rates and long timescales has led to a general inability to account for all geologic observations in this region. During the Cretaceous and before the uplift of the Rocky Mountains, a large swath of Western North America was below sea level. This is evidenced by large deposits of sediment in what is referred to as the Western Interior Seaway. Secular modeling studies of the Western Interior Seaway have been unable to recreate the full depth and breadth of the seaway using old earth assumptions. Immediately following the formation of this seaway, The Colorado Plateau, Rocky Mountains, and Great Plains all rose to several kilometers above sea level. The timing and mechanism by which these regions uplifted so far from a plate boundary has been a subject of great secular debate. In this study, we use geodynamic modeling to show that CPT during the Biblical Flood resulted in the formation of the Western Interior Seaway. We hypothesize that rapid collision of the North American Plate with the Farallon Plate resulted in the North American Plate overriding the subduction zone and causing low-angle subduction far inboard of the subduction trench. The Western Interior Seaway was therefore formed as an expression of double thickness of the mantle lithosphere as the Farallon Plate was overridden by the North American plate, and this weight pulled down on the lithosphere. Geodynamic modeling of CPT during the Biblical Flood provides answers to questions about the formation of many tectonic features in western North America that are precluded by naturalistic assumptions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
- Authors
- Petersen, S., & Baumgardner, J.
- Affiliations
- Liberty University (US)
- ORCID
- Baumgardner, John
- Venue
- The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism
- Publisher
- Centennial Library
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 648
- ISSN
- 2639-3999 (ISSN-L)
- 2639-4006
- OpenAlex
- W4409645602
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism/Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Creationism (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Keywords
- biblical flood, Western Interior Seaway, Farallon plate, North American plate, low-angle subduction, lithospheric mantle, Rocky Mountains, Great Plains, geodynamic modeling, young-earth creationism, Cretaceous paleogeography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review