The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)
Open accessAbstract
An effective way for managing and controlling a large number of inventory items or stock keeping units (SKUs) is the inventory classification. Traditional ABC analysis which based on only a single criterion is commonly used for classification of SKUs. However, we should consider inventory classification as a multi-criteria problem in practice. In this study, a new method of Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) is introduced for multi-criteria inventory classification (MCIC) problems. In the proposed method, we use positive and negative distances from the average solution for appraising alternatives (SKUs). To represent performance of the proposed method in MCIC problems, we use a common example with 47 SKUs. Comparing the results of the proposed method with some existing methods shows the good performance of it in ABC classification. The proposed method can also be used for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. A comparative analysis is also made for showing the validity and stability of the proposed method in MCDM problems. We compare the proposed method with VIKOR, TOPSIS, SAW and COPRAS methods using an example. Seven sets of criteria weights and Spearman’s correlation coefficient are used for this analysis. The results show that the proposed method is stable in different weights and well consistent with the other methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY EDAS METHOD: AN APPLICATION TO SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE SELECTION
KAHRAMAN, C., KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE, M., ZAVADSKAS, E. K., CEVIK ONAR, S., YAZDANI, M., & OZTAYSI, B. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management · doi:10.3846/16486897.2017.1281139 · Cited by 341
Self-citationRETRACTED: Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-17184 · Cited by 142
Self-citationRetractedParamanik, A. R., Sarkar, S., & Sarkar, B. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108138 · Cited by 128
A new fuzzy methodology-based structured framework for RAM and risk analysis
Panchal, D., Singh, A. K., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.033 · Cited by 61
Self-citationHosseini Dehshiri, S. J., Mostafaeipour, A., & Amiri, M. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122785 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z.
- Venue
- Informatica
- Publisher
- Vilnius University Press
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-451
- ISSN
- 0868-4952 (ISSN-L)
- 1822-8844
- OpenAlex
- W2259660946
- Cited by
- 1,366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15388/informatica.2015.57
- The paper
- Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica. https://doi.org/10.15388/informatica.2015.57
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.