Cited by 17Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementMulti-Criteria Decision MakingEnergy and Environmental Sustainability

Evaluating challenges of circular economy and Internet of Things in renewable energy supply chain through a hybrid decision-making framework

Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin, Mostafaeipour, Ali, Amiri, Maghsoud·2024·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Due to industrial development, expansion of communities, and attention to sustainable development, sustainable energy supply has become a big challenge for communities. In this regard, the development and use of Renewable Energy (RE) are considered due to reducing the harmful environmental effects of fossil fuels. Improving the efficiency of the Renewable Energy Supply Chain (RESC) is important for using RE. To improve the performance and efficiency of RESC, it is necessary to use emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and its integration with the principles of the Circular Economy (CE). Therefore, this study proposes integrating IoT and CE for sustainable development and resource management in RESC. Also, this research provides a hybrid decision framework to assess the challenges of IoT and CE in the RESC of Iran. The CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) technique is used to specify the importance of the criteria. The Fuzzy Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (FEDAS) technique ranks the challenges. The findings indicated that considering the cost of investment, the rate of return on investment, and the productivity rate were the most important sub-criteria with values of 0.149, 0.129, and 0.106 respectively. Then, the sensitivity of the results is examined and the validation of the findings is analyzed with decision-making methods. The results indicate the high priority of the challenge related to transparency in the implementation procedures of IoT and RE projects and information dissemination protocols, the development of guidelines for the integration of IoT in other systems in the information network, and the amount of investment and lack of access to financial resources. This study provided practical insights for RE development based on IoT and CE capabilities for energy planning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122785

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., Mostafaeipour, A., & Amiri, M.
Affiliations
  • Duy Tan University (VN)
  • Allameh Tabataba'i University (IR)
Corresponding author
Mostafaeipour, Ali
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
370
Pages
122785
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403194755
Cited by
17
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy and Environmental Sustainability
Keywords
circular economy, Internet of Things, renewable energy supply chain, critics, challenge prioritization, investment costs, return on investment, resource management, energy planning, Iran
MeSH terms
Sustainable Development, Internet of Things, Decision Making, Iran, Renewable Energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review