Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparision of Snowball Sampling and Sequential Sampling Technique

Open access
Etikan, Ilker·2016·Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal
DOI 10.15406/bbij.2016.03.00055
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The article provides the description and comparison of two non-random samplings which are snowball or chain referral sampling and sequential sampling.Snowball sampling has been widely used in qualitative sociological research, especially in the study of deviant behavior and is used in the place where the population is hard to reach.It also described different form of sampling method.While in sequential sampling, sampling was taken at a given time interval and modification can be made by correcting the research and sampling method to centralize the analysis and make a satisfied decision.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15406/bbij.2016.03.00055

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jonhston LG, Keith S (2010) Sampling Hard To reach Population with Resspondent-Driven sampling. Methodological Innovations Online 5(2): 38-48.
  2. Jawale KV (2012) Methods of Sampling Design in the Legal Research: Advantages and Disadvantages. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal: 183-190.

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Etikan, I.
Venue
Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal
Publisher
MedCrave Group, LLC
Published
2016-01-02
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2378-315X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.15406/bbij.2016.03.00055
OpenAlex
W2523028282
Cited by
485
References
4
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.