The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Thematic Analysis and its Pitfall
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This study also noted that 75% them believed that the faculty members are not adequate for preparatory work for CBME implementation.[10]”
From Challenges in Implementing Competency-based Medical Education in India - Stakeholders' Perspective: A Mixed-method Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“These findings were concordant with the study conducted by Ramanathan et al. who also mentioned that lack of trained faculty was the major challenge.”
From Challenges in Implementing Competency-based Medical Education in India - Stakeholders' Perspective: A Mixed-method Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risk analysis of the agri-food supply chain: A multi-method approach
Zhao, G., Liu, S., López, C., Chen, H., Lu, H., Mangla, S. K., & Elgueta, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1725684 · Cited by 181
Karavadra, B., Stöckl, A., Prosser‐Snelling, E., Simpson, P. D., & Morris, E. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03283-2 · Cited by 180
Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes about dementia care: Systematic literature review
Evripidou, M., Charalambous, A., Middleton, N., & Papastavrou, E. (2018) · Perspectives In Psychiatric Care · doi:10.1111/ppc.12291 · Cited by 166
Misaki, E., Apiola, M., Gaiani, S., & Tedre, M. (2018) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/isd2.12034 · Cited by 102
Schwaiger, K. M., Zehrer, A., & Braun, B. (2021) · Tourism Review · doi:10.1108/tr-01-2021-0035 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Javadi, M., & Zarea, K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Client Care
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2476-6682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2518605588
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 84.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Client Care (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- thematic analysis, qualitative data analysis, qualitative research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
