The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality Improvement Methods in Clinical Medicine
Abstract
This article surveys the methods and tools of quality improvement used today in health care. Specifically, we describe how clinicians can use these methods to impact the clinical practice of medicine. Improvement teams from a variety of health care organizations have reported the successful use of basic methods such as group work, flowcharting, data collection, and graphical data analysis. In addition to these incremental, problem-solving methods borrowed from the industrial practice of improvement, we have also seen the use of specific process design methods in health care applications such as care path development. The pace of change in health care has also led to the practical development of newer methods for rapid cycle improvement. We will review the basic approach behind these methods and illustrate key elements such as the ideas of change concepts and small-scale tests of change. Unfortunately, whereas these methods have been very successful and highly appealing to improvement practitioners, they may also have inadvertently widened a gulf between these practitioners and traditional health-services and clinical researchers. We offer an assessment of this issue and suggest ways to narrow the communication gap. Measurement has also traditionally been a part of the thinking about quality assurance and improvement in health care. We review the new philosophy of measurement that has emerged from recent improvement thinking and describe the use of control charts in clinical improvement. Benchmarking and multiorganizational collaboratives are more recent innovations in the ways we approach improvement in health care. These efforts go beyond simple measurement and explore the why and how associated with the widespread variation in performance in health care. We explore a variety of health care examples to illustrate these methods and the lessons learned in their use. We conclude the article with an overview of four habits that we believe are essential for health care organizations and individual clinicians to adopt to bring about real improvement in the clinical practice of medicine. These are the habits for: 1) viewing clinical practice as a process; 2) evidence-based practice; 3) collaborative learning; and 4) change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: IX. A Method for Grading Health Care Recommendations
Guyatt, G. H. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035 · Cited by 846
Cited by
Donovan, J., Little, P., Mills, N., Smith, M., Brindle, L., Jacoby, A., Peters, T., Frankel, S., Neal, D., & Hamdy, F. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766 · Cited by 533
Collaborative Quality Improvement for Neonatal Intensive Care
Horbar, J. D., Rogowski, J., Plsek, P. E., Delmore, P., Edwards, W. H., Hocker, J., Kantak, A. D., Lewallen, P., Lewis, W., Lewit, E., et al. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.1.14 · Cited by 395
Self-citationWeight Growth Velocity and Postnatal Growth Failure in Infants 501 to 1500 Grams: 2000–2013
Horbar, J. D., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Badger, G. J., Edwards, E. M., Morrow, K. A., Soll, R. F., Buzas, J. S., Bertino, E., Gagliardi, L., & Bellù, R. (2015) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0129 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Plsek, P. E.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- Supplement_E1
- Pages
- 203-214
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1847466052
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality Improvement Methods in Clinical Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.103.se1.203
- The paper
- Plsek, P. E. (1999). Quality Improvement Methods in Clinical Medicine. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.se1.203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.