The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cost of Chickenpox in Canada: Part I. Cost of Uncomplicated Cases
Abstract
Objective.: The purpose of this study was to assess the direct medical costs and productivity losses associated with uncomplicated chickenpox (no hospitalization) in Canada. Methods.: A total of 179 otherwise healthy 1- to 9-year-old children with active chickenpox were recruited from schools, day care centers, and physician offices in 5 provinces. Direct medical (physician contacts, medication, and diagnostic tests) and nonmedical (personal expenses including child care) resources expended during the illness were determined by caregiver interview. Productivity losses attributable to the disease were determined by assessing caregiver time lost from work and daily activities. Unit costs for all resources were obtained from sources in 2 provinces, and per-patient treatment costs were determined from the patient, Ministry of Health, and societal perspectives. Results.: From a societal perspective, the per-case cost for children from 1 to 4 years of age and from 5 to 9 years of age was $370.2 and $236.5, respectively. Direct medical costs accounted for 10% of the total costs in both groups. The largest cost driver in patient care was caregiver productivity losses, which amounted to $316.5 in the younger age group and to $182.7 in the older age group. Based on an estimated yearly incidence of 344 656 cases of uncomplicated chickenpox in Canada, the total annual societal burden of the disease can be estimated at $109.2 million, with a cost to the Ministry of Health of $11.2 million. Conclusion.: Chickenpox is one of the last common childhood diseases prevalent in Canada, and the uncomplicated disease, despite its rather benign course, imparts a large annual economic burden.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prenatal and Postnatal Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Children’s Health
DiFranza, J. R., Aligne, C. A., & Weitzman, M. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.s3.1007 · Cited by 772
Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability
Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2001) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0021-9924(01)00060-0 · Cited by 508
Clinician Support and Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Breastfeeding Discontinuation
Taveras, E. M., Capra, A. M., Braveman, P. A., Jensvold, N. G., Escobar, G. J., & Lieu, T. A. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.1.108 · Cited by 503
Epidemiology of varicella zoster virus infection in Canada and the United Kingdom
BRISSON, M., EDMUNDS, W. J., LAW, B., GAY, N. J., WALLD, R., BROWNELL, M., ROOS, L. L., & DE SERRES, G. (2001) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268801005921 · Cited by 432
Self-citationEffects of Vitamin A Supplementation on Immune Responses and Correlation with Clinical Outcomes
Villamor, E., & Fawzi, W. W. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.3.446-464.2005 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Law, B., Fitzsimon, C., Ford-Jones, L., MacDonald, N., Déry, P., Vaudry, W., Mills, E., Halperin, S., Michaliszyn, A., & Rivière, M.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1979815650
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost of Chickenpox in Canada: Part I. Cost of Uncomplicated Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.104.1.1
- The paper
- Law, B., Fitzsimon, C., Ford-Jones, L., MacDonald, N., Déry, P., Vaudry, W., Mills, E., Halperin, S., Michaliszyn, A., & Rivière, M. (1999). Cost of Chickenpox in Canada: Part I. Cost of Uncomplicated Cases. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.104.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.