The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Parents Understand Immunizations? A National Telephone Survey
Abstract
Background.: Immunization may now be undervalued because vaccines have largely eliminated the threat of serious infectious diseases in childhood. As the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases has declined, concern about vaccine safety has increased. Significant erosion of public confidence in vaccine safety could lead to reduced immunization rates and a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases. Objective and Methods.: To assess parents' understanding of vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccines, immunization practices, and policies, we conducted a telephone survey in the United States with a nationally representative sample (n = 1600) of parents with children ≤6 years of age, and expectant parents in April and May 1999. Results.: Eighty-seven percent of respondents deemed immunization an extremely important action that parents can take to keep their children well. Although respondents' overall rating of immunization safety was high, a substantial minority held important misconceptions. For example, 25% believed that their child's immune system could become weakened as a result of too many immunizations, and 23% believed that children get more immunizations than are good for them. Children's health care providers were cited as the most important source of information on immunizations. Conclusions.: Although the majority of parents understand the benefits of immunization and support its use, many parents have important misconceptions that could erode their confidence in vaccines. A systematic educational effort addressing common misconceptions is needed to ensure informed immunization decision-making. Physicians, nurses, and other providers of primary care have a unique opportunity to educate parents because parents see them as the most important source of information about immunizations. vaccination, immunization, pediatric, safety, health beliefs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Eisenberg, D. M., Davis, R. B., Ettner, S. L., Appel, S., Wilkey, S., Van Rompay, M., & Kessler, R. C. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.18.1569 · Cited by 6,658
Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030404 · Cited by 854
Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story
Gangarosa, E., Galazka, A., Wolfe, C., Phillips, L., Miller, E., Chen, R., & Gangarosa, R. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04334-1 · Cited by 749
Withdrawal of Rotavirus Vaccine Recommendation
(1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.22.2113-jwr1208-2-1 · Cited by 298
Salmon, D. A., Haber, M., Gangarosa, E. J., Phillips, L., Smith, N. J., & Chen, R. T. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.1.47 · Cited by 285
Meszaros, J. R., Asch, D. A., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., Kunreuther, H., & Schwartz-Buzaglo, J. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(96)00007-8 · Cited by 271
Prislin, R., Dyer, J. A., Blakely, C. H., & Johnson, C. D. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.12.1821 · Cited by 209
Risky Business: Challenges in Vaccine Risk Communication
Ball, L. K., Evans, G., & Bostrom, A. (1998) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.101.3.453 · Cited by 191
Why (Cancer) Risk Communication Can Be Hard
Fischhoff, B. (1999) · JNCI Monographs · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024213 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Herzog, R., Álvarez-Pasquin, M. J., Díaz, C., Del Barrio, J. L., Estrada, J. M., & Gil, Á. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-154 · Cited by 1,652
A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments
Pollard, A. J., & Bijker, E. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00479-7 · Cited by 1,593
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust
Benin, A. L., Wisler-Scher, D. J., Colson, E., Shapiro, E. D., & Holmboe, E. S. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1728 · Cited by 608
Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009
Freed, G. L., Clark, S. J., Butchart, A. T., Singer, D. C., & Davis, M. M. (2010) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1962 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Gellin, B. G., Maibach, E. W., Marcuse, E. K., & for the National Network for Immunization Information Steering Committee∥
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1097-1102
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2120597337
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Parents Understand Immunizations? A National Telephone Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.106.5.1097
- The paper
- Gellin, B. G., Maibach, E. W., Marcuse, E. K., & for the National Network for Immunization Information Steering Committee∥. (2000). Do Parents Understand Immunizations? A National Telephone Survey. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.5.1097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.