The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Preschoolers' Self-Regulation of Energy Intake
Abstract
Background.: Children exhibit individual differences in their ability to self-regulate energy intake. Feeding strategies that focus on external signals, like the time of day or amount of food left on a plate, tend to diminish children's ability to respond to internal cues of hunger and fullness. Objectives.: We investigated whether children could be taught to focus on internal cues of hunger and satiety, and consequently improve their self-regulation of energy intake. We explored whether parents' eating behaviors and adiposity were related to their children's self-regulation skills and adiposity. Design.: In a pretest and posttest design, preschoolers participated in single-meal protocols to assess their individual ability to self-regulate food intake. During a 6-week intervention period, children took part in individual and group activities designed to help them recognize internal cues. Parents completed questionnaires regarding adult dietary restraint and disinhibition. Results.: At baseline, we found a large individual variability in children's regulation: some children overate, some regulated accurately, and others underate. At baseline, children's eating related to their adiposity and to mothers' disinhibition: heavier children and children whose mothers' reported difficulty controlling food intake showed less evidence of self-regulation. Both overeaters and undereaters responded to the intervention, improving their ability to self-regulate, and children's eating was no longer significantly related to mother's eating. Conclusions.: Children's disregulated energy intake is related to mothers' weight status and mothers' perceived control over eating. Cues can be provided that help children to focus on internal signals and improve their ability to self-regulate energy intake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687
Cited by
Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Policies
(2011) · doi:10.17226/13124 · Cited by 452
Schwartz, C., Scholtens, P. A. M. J., Lalanne, A., Weenen, H., & Nicklaus, S. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.316 · Cited by 411
Disinhibition: its effects on appetite and weight regulation
Bryant, E. J., King, N. A., & Blundell, J. E. (2008) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2007.00426.x · Cited by 352
Eating Motives and the Controversy over Dieting: Eating Less Than Needed versus Less Than Wanted
Lowe, M. R., & Levine, A. S. (2005) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2005.90 · Cited by 293
Disordered eating attitudes and behaviors in overweight youth
Goldschmidt, A. B., Aspen, V. P., Sinton, M. M., Tanofsky‐Kraff, M., & Wilfley, D. E. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.48 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S. L.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1429-1435
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2047043404
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Preschoolers' Self-Regulation of Energy Intake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.106.6.1429
- The paper
- Johnson, S. L. (2000). Improving Preschoolers' Self-Regulation of Energy Intake. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.6.1429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.