An Assessment of Thimerosal Use in Childhood Vaccines
Abstract
Background.: On July 7, 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US Public Health Service issued a joint statement calling for removal of thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, from vaccines. This action was prompted in part by a risk assessment from the Food and Drug Administration that is presented here. Methods.: The risk assessment consisted of hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. The literature was reviewed to identify known toxicity of thimerosal, ethylmercury (a metabolite of thimerosal) and methylmercury (a similar organic mercury compound) and to determine the doses at which toxicity occurs. Maximal potential exposure to mercury from vaccines was calculated for children at 6 months old and 2 years, under the US childhood immunization schedule, and compared with the limits for mercury exposure developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, the Food and Drug Administration, and the World Health Organization. Results.: Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions from thimerosal exposure are well-recognized. Identified acute toxicity from inadvertent high-dose exposure to thimerosal includes neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Limited data on toxicity from low-dose exposures to ethylmercury are available, but toxicity may be similar to that of methylmercury. Chronic, low-dose methylmercury exposure may cause subtle neurologic abnormalities. Depending on the immunization schedule, vaccine formulation, and infant weight, cumulative exposure of infants to mercury from thimerosal during the first 6 months of life may exceed EPA guidelines. Conclusion.: Our review revealed no evidence of harm caused by doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for local hypersensitivity reactions. However, some infants may be exposed to cumulative levels of mercury during the first 6 months of life that exceed EPA recommendations. Exposure of infants to mercury in vaccines can be reduced or eliminated by using products formulated without thimerosal as a preservative.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the final product of a registered homoeopathic remedy, no harmful molecules from whatever source should remain.
“In the final product, no harmful molecules from whatever source should remain.”
From A Physician’s View on Legal Aspects of the Contemporary Medical Use of Mercury in Germany (2013) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The toxicology of mercury—current exposures and clinical manifestations
Clarkson, T. W., Magos, L., & Myers, G. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022471 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Fombonne, E., Zakarian, R., Bennett, A., Meng, L., & McLean-Heywood, D. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2993 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Prenatal and infant exposure to thimerosal from vaccines and immunoglobulins and risk of autism
Price, C. S., Thompson, W. W., Goodson, B., Weintraub, E. S., Croen, L. A., Hinrichsen, V. L., Marcy, M., Robertson, A., Eriksen, E., Lewis, E., et al. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-0309 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002.
Gallagher, C. M., & Goodman, M. S. (2010) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/15287394.2010.519317 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
RetractedTozzi, A. E., Bisiacchi, P., Tarantino, V., De Mei, B., D'Elia, L., Chiarotti, F., & Salmaso, S. (2009) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0795 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A Physician’s View on Legal Aspects of the Contemporary Medical Use of Mercury in Germany
Aschoff, J. C. (2013) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341276 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ball, L. K., Ball, R., & Pratt, R. D.
- Affiliations
- From the Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, and the
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (US)
- ORCID
- Ball, Robert
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1147-1154
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2165001017
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Keywords
- thimerosal, childhood vaccines, mercury exposure, ethylmercury, methylmercury, vaccine preservatives, mercury toxicity, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, delayed-type hypersensitivity, cumulative exposure, infant immunization schedule
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Child, Preschool, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Delayed, Immunization, Infant, Mercury, Mercury Poisoning, Methylmercury Compounds, Preservatives, Pharmaceutical, Thimerosal, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines, Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review