Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Early Intervention on Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

Ponsford, Jennie, Willmott, Catherine, Rothwell, Andrew, Cameron, Peter, Ayton, Gary, Nelms, Robyn, Curran, Carolyn, Ng, Kim·2001·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives. The impact of mild head injury or mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children is variable, and determinants of outcome remain poorly understood. There have been no previous attempts to evaluate the impact of interventions to improve outcome. Results of previous intervention studies in adults have been mixed. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of providing information on outcome measured in terms of reported symptoms, cognitive performance, and psychological adjustment in children 3 months after injury. Methods. A total of 61 children with mild TBI were assessed 1 week and 3 months after injury, and 58 children with mild TBI were assessed 3 months after injury only. They were compared with 2 control groups (N = 45 and 47) of children with minor injuries not involving the head. Participants completed measures of preinjury behavior and psychological adjustment, postconcussion symptoms, and tests of attention, speed of information processing, and memory. Children with mild TBI seen at 1 week were also given an information booklet outlining symptoms associated with mild TBI and suggested coping strategies. Those seen 3 months after injury only did not receive this booklet. Results. Children with mild TBI reported more symptoms than controls at 1 week but demonstrated no impairment on neuropsychological measures. Initial symptoms had resolved for most children by 3 months after injury, but a small group of children who had previous head injury or a history of learning or behavioral difficulties reported ongoing problems. The group not seen at 1 week and not given the information booklet reported more symptoms overall and was more stressed 3 months after injury. Conclusions. Providing an information booklet reduces anxiety and thereby lowers the incidence of ongoing problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.108.6.1297

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Ponsford, J., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Cameron, P., Ayton, G., Nelms, R., Curran, C., & Ng, K.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
108
Issue
6
Pages
1297-1303
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2096152928
Cited by
387
References
1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.