CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards traumatic brain injury (TBI): The influence of profession, experience, aetiology and blame on prejudice towards survivors of brain injury

Redpath, S. J., Williams, W. H., Hanna, D., Linden, M. A., Yates, P., Harris, A.·2010·Brain Injury
DOI 10.3109/02699051003709623
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Primary objective To investigate the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their relationship to intended healthcare behaviour. Research design An independent groups design utilized four independent variables; aetiology, group, blame and gender to explore attitudes towards survivors of brain injury. The dependent variables were measured using the Prejudicial Evaluation and Social Interaction Scale (PESIS) and Helping Behaviour Scale (HBS). Methods and procedures A hypothetical vignette based methodology was used. Four hundred and sixty participants (131 trainee nurses, 94 qualified nurses, 174 trainee doctors, 61 qualified doctors) were randomly allocated to one of six possible conditions. Main outcomes and results Regardless of aetiology, if an individual is to blame for their injury, qualified healthcare professionals have more prejudicial attitudes than those entering the profession. There is a significant negative relationship between prejudice and helping behaviour for qualified healthcare professionals. Conclusions Increased prejudicial attitudes of qualified staff are related to a decrease in intended helping behaviour, which has the potential to impact negatively on an individual's recovery post-injury.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02699051003709623

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1080/096020199389482 · DOI
  2. McClure J, 2008, Brain Injury, 22, 639, 10.1080/02699050802255585 · DOI
  3. McClure J, 2006, Brain Injury, 20, 1029, 10.1080/02699050600909870 · DOI
  4. Manchester D, 2006, Brain Injury, 20, 1029, 10.1080/02699050600909870 · DOI
  5. Ponsford J, 2001, Pediatrics, 108, 1297, 10.1542/peds.108.6.1297 · DOI
  6. McKinlay A, 2001, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 107, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.3411728.x · DOI
  7. Wanless LK, 2005, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 544, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00693.x · DOI
  8. Weigel L, 2006, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 205, 10.1348/014466505X67510 · DOI
  9. Corrigan P, 1999, American Psychologist, 54, 765, 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.765 · DOI
  10. Perlick DA, 2001, Psychiatric Services, 52, 1613, 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1613 · DOI
  11. Perlick DA, 2001, Psychiatric Services, 52, 1627, 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1627 · DOI
  12. Weiner B, 1985, Psychological Reviews, 92, 547, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Weiner B, 1986, An attribution theory of motivation and emotion, 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 · DOI
  14. Haslam SA, 2001, Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach
  15. Markham D, 2003, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 243, 10.1348/01446650360703366 · DOI
  16. Redpath SJ, 2004, Brain Injury, 18, 861, 10.1080/02699050410001671838 · DOI
  17. Linden MA, 2007, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 665, 10.1016/j.acn.2007.04.009 · DOI
  18. Linden MA, 2005, Brain Injury, 19, 1011, 10.1080/02699050500110314 · DOI
  19. Cohen J, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences2nd
  20. Kelly JA, 1987, Journal of Medical Education, 62, 549
  21. Stewart D, 1999, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 740, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01140.x · DOI
  22. George D, 2003, SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update4th
  23. 10.1080/713755551 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01374-X · DOI
  25. Bessell AL, 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 63, 10.1017/S1355617708080065 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/09602010244000354 · DOI
  27. McManus IC, 2004, BMC Medicine, 2, 29, 10.1186/1741-7015-2-29 · DOI
  28. Franks JA, 2002, British Journal of Clinical Governance, 7, 34, 10.1108/14664100210418011 · DOI
  29. Doyal L, 2006, International Journal of Surgery, 4, 146, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.023 · DOI
  30. Hair JF, 1995, Multivariate data analysis with readings4th

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Redpath, S. J., Williams, W. H., Hanna, D., Linden, M. A., Yates, P., & Harris, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Redpath, S. J.
ORCID
Venue
Brain Injury
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-05-10
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
802-811
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
DOI
10.3109/02699051003709623
OpenAlex
W1979653744
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E002692/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, clinician attitudes, prejudice, blame, helping behavior, nurses, physicians, professional experience, gender differences, vignette method
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Brain Injuries, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review