Cited by 188Sleep and related disordersCoffee research and impactsSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caffeine Consumption and Weekly Sleep Patterns in US Seventh-, Eighth-, and Ninth-Graders

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey caffeine use by seventh-, eighth-, and ninth-graders and relate its use to age, sex, sleep characteristics, and day of week METHODS: Students kept a daily, 2-week diary of their sleep times and use of caffeine containing drinks and foods. Data were analyzed by fitted multiple regression models RESULTS: A total of 191 students participated. Caffeine intake ranged between 0 and 800 mg/d. Mean use over 2 weeks ranged up to 379.4 mg/d and averaged 62.7 mg/d (corrected for underrepresentation in our sample of boys, who consumed more caffeine). Higher caffeine intake in general was associated with shorter nocturnal sleep duration, increased wake time after sleep onset, and increased daytime sleep. SLEEP PATTERNS: Mean bedtime was 10:57 PM, and mean wake time was at 7:14 AM. Older children delayed bedtime longer on weekends, and younger ones had longer nightly sleep durations. Sleep duration lengthened on weekends, reflecting the combined effects of the circadian timing system and a mechanism that regulates the duration of sleep. Caffeine (soda) consumption also increased on weekends, for reasons that may be primarily social CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether caffeine use disturbed sleep or was consumed to counteract the daytime effect of interrupted sleep, caffeinated beverages had detectable pharmacologic effects. Limitation of the availability of caffeine to teenagers should therefore be considered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.111.1.42

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pollak CP, Bright D. Caffeine consumption and weekly sleep patterns in US seventh, eighth and ninth graders. Sleep2000;24:A12

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–188 of 188

Metadata

Authors
Pollak, C. P., & Bright, D.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bright, David
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
42-46
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2163328071
Cited by
188
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
caffeine consumption, adolescent sleep patterns, sleep duration, bedtime, wake after sleep onset, daytime sleep, circadian timing, caffeinated beverages, soft drink consumption
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Beverages, Caffeine, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Ohio, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review