Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extrauterine Growth Restriction Remains a Serious Problem in Prematurely Born Neonates

Clark, Reese H., Thomas, Pam, Peabody, Joyce·2003·Pediatrics

Abstract

Background. Poor growth is a common problem in premature neonates and may be associated with neurodevelopmental delay. Objective. To evaluate the incidence of extrauterine growth restriction (growth values ≤10th percentile of intrauterine growth expectation based on estimated postmenstrual age in premature (23–34 weeks’ estimated gestational age) neonates at the time they are discharged from the hospital. Design/Methods. Using a database formed from a computer-assisted tool that generates clinical progress notes and discharge summaries on neonatal intensive care unit admissions, we reviewed data on neonates discharged from 124 neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2000. We evaluated neonates who were born between 23 and 34 weeks’ estimated gestational age without congenital anomalies and who were cared for at and discharged from the same hospital. For each patient, we compared the discharge growth values to the expected values based on our intrauterine growth data and postmenstrual age on the day of discharge. We defined extrauterine growth restriction as having a measured growth value (weight, length or head circumference) that was ≤10th percentile of the predicted value. In each specific birth weight and estimated gestational age group, we counted the number of neonates ≤10th percentile for each growth parameter and calculated the percentage of patients who had values ≤10th percentile at discharge. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the factors associated with extrauterine growth restriction for weight, length, and head circumference. Results. Our sample included 24 371 premature neonates. Data on discharge weight, length, and head circumference was available on 23 970, 17 203, and 20 885 neonates, respectively. The incidence of extrauterine growth restriction was common (28%, 34%, and 16% for weight, length, and head circumference, respectively). For each growth parameter, the incidence of extrauterine growth restriction increased with decreasing estimated gestational age and birth weight. Factors independently associated with extrauterine growth restriction were male gender, need for assisted ventilation on day 1 of life, a history of necrotizing enterocolitis, need for respiratory support at 28 days of age, and exposure to steroids during the hospital course. Conclusions. Extrauterine growth restriction remains a serious problem in premature neonates especially for neonates who are small, immature, and critically ill.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.111.5.986

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
Clark, R. H., Thomas, P., & Peabody, J.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
986-990
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2019700480
Cited by
609
References
0
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrauterine Growth Restriction Remains a Serious Problem in Prematurely Born Neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.111.5.986
The paper
Clark, R. H., Thomas, P., & Peabody, J. (2003). Extrauterine Growth Restriction Remains a Serious Problem in Prematurely Born Neonates. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.5.986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.