Cited by 218Infant Nutrition and HealthClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyInfant Development and Preterm Care

Meeting the Nutritional Needs of the Low-Birth-Weight Infant

Ziegler, Ekhard E.·2011·Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Delivering adequate amounts of nutrients to premature infants at all times is challenging because the infant’s immature gastrointestinal tract is initially unable to accept feedings, necessitating the use of parenteral nutrition. In the past, inadequate amounts of nutrients have commonly been given to premature infants because the administration of nutrients was thought to be hazardous. Inadequate nutrient intakes have resulted in widespread postnatal growth restriction. Now that it is known that postnatal growth restriction is associated with poor neurocognitive development, efforts are made to increase nutrient intakes. In this review, nutrient requirements of premature infants that have been determined by the factorial and empirical methods are reviewed. Current good practices regarding parenteral nutrition are discussed, as are guidelines for the introduction and advancement of enteral feedings. Because of its trophic effects on the gastrointestinal tract and its anti-infectious effects, human milk is strongly preferred as the early feeding of choice for premature infants. Human milk also protects infants against necrotizing enterocolitis. Once full feeding is achieved, the challenge is to provide nutrients in amounts that support the infant’s growth like that of the fetus. In the case of the infant fed his/her mother’s milk or banked donor milk, nutrient fortification is necessary and is generally practiced. However, adequate intakes of protein are seldom achieved with routine fortification and methods of providing additional fortification are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000323381

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziegler, E. E.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Ziegler, Ekhard E.
Venue
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2011
Volume
58
Issue
Suppl. 1
Pages
8-18
ISSN
  • 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9697
OpenAlex
W2075593674
Cited by
217
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
low birth weight infants, preterm infants, nutrient requirements, parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, postnatal growth restriction, neurocognitive development, breast milk, donor human milk, necrotizing enterocolitis, nutrient fortification, protein intake, factorial method, empirical methods
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Enteral Nutrition, Food, Fortified, Humans, Infant, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Milk, Human, Nutritional Requirements, Parenteral Nutrition, Guidelines as Topic, Sepsis, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Empirical Research, Infant Formula, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review