The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entertainment Television as a Healthy Sex Educator: The Impact of Condom-Efficacy Information in an Episode of Friends
Abstract
Context. Television is often decried as a negative influence on the sexual attitudes and behavior of America’s adolescents. However, television occasionally includes messages about the risks of having sex that may have a positive effect on youth. Objective. To assess the impact of condom-efficacy messages in an episode of Friends on teens. Design, Setting, and Participants. A national sample of 506 adolescents 12 to 17 years old who had been regular viewers of Friends the previous year were surveyed by telephone shortly after the episode aired. Outcome Measures. Viewership of the Friends episode, recall of the condom-efficacy message, beliefs about condoms, self-reported change in condom knowledge, and discussions of condom efficacy with parents. Results. At least 27% of the sample saw the episode, and 65% of these viewers recalled its depiction of condom failure resulting in pregnancy. Forty percent of the viewers watched with an adult. Ten percent of viewers talked to an adult about condom efficacy as a result of the show. Compared with other viewers, youth who talked with an adult were more likely to report learning about condoms from the episode and appeared less likely to reduce their perceptions of condom efficacy after the episode. Conclusions. Entertainment television can serve as a healthy sex educator and can work in conjunction with parents to improve adolescent sexual knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Cited by
Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x · Cited by 1,365
Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x · Cited by 709
Health Effects of Media on Children and Adolescents
Strasburger, V. C., Jordan, A. B., & Donnerstein, E. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2563 · Cited by 527
Mass Media Effects on Youth Sexual Behavior Assessing the Claim for Causality
Wright, P. J. (2011) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2011.11679121 · Cited by 373
Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H., & Jain, P. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Berry, S. H., Kanouse, D. E., & Hunter, S. B.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1115-1121
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1992397487
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entertainment Television as a Healthy Sex Educator: The Impact of Condom-Efficacy Information in an Episode of Friends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.112.5.1115
- The paper
- Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Berry, S. H., Kanouse, D. E., & Hunter, S. B. (2003). Entertainment Television as a Healthy Sex Educator: The Impact of Condom-Efficacy Information in an Episode of Friends. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.5.1115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.