The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion
Abstract
Research has examined the ability of entertainment-education (E-E) programs to influence behavior across a variety of health and social issues. However, less is known about the underlying mechanisms that account for these effects. In keeping with the extended elaboration likelihood model (E-ELM) and the entertainment overcoming resistance model (EORM), we examined how story features, such as narrative transportation and involvement with characters, may reduce three forms of resistance to persuasion—reactance, counterarguing, and perceived invulnerability. In a between-subjects experiment, 367 undergraduates viewed either a dramatic narrative or a nonnarrative program about the difficult consequences of an unplanned teen pregnancy. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing their reactions to the program immediately after viewing and again 2 weeks later. Consistent with predictions derived from the EORM and E-ELM, the dramatic narrative reduced reactance by fostering parasocial interaction with characters and decreasing perceptions of persuasive intent. Also as expected, identification with characters in the narrative reduced counterarguing and increased perceived vulnerability to unplanned pregnancy—although the latter occurred only at the delayed posttest 2 weeks after exposure. Unexpectedly, transportation into the dramatic narrative was associated with greater counterarguing. Taken together, this research demonstrates that investigating narrative influence from the perspective of overcoming resistance is a useful approach. Findings also suggest important differences in how individuals process narrative and nonnarrative messages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 · Cited by 4,861
A Theory of Psychological Reactance
Torrance, E. P., & Brehm, J. W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420824 · Cited by 4,759
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
(1981) · Cited by 3,038
Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters
Cohen, J. (2001) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0403_01 · Cited by 1,928
A Theory of Psychological Reactance
Mishler, E. G. (1968) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-196811000-00013 · Cited by 1,665
On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication
Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750500111815 · Cited by 1,571
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x · Cited by 1,458
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Farrar, 2006, Sexual intercourse on television: Do safe sex messages matter?, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50, 635, 10.1207/s15506878jobem5004_4 · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5004_4
- Moyer-Gusé, E. , & Nabi, R. L. (2008). Comparing the persuasive effects of entertainment-education and educational programming on risky sexual behavior. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association in Montreal, Canada.
- Singhal, 2004, Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice
- Slater, 2002, Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations, 157
- Sood, 2004, Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice, 117
- Zillmann, 1976, Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and application, 93
Cited by
Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111 · Cited by 1,159
The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review
Rains, S. A. (2013) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x · Cited by 511
A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.
Rosenberg, B. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2018) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000091 · Cited by 386
The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF)
Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.987400 · Cited by 309
Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Review of the Literature
Reynolds-Tylus, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-52
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2147710454
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 287.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2069 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
- The paper
- Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.