Cited by 238Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

A Comparison of Once-Daily Extended-Release Methylphenidate Formulations in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the Laboratory School (The Comacs Study)

Swanson, James M., Wigal, Sharon B., Wigal, Tim, Sonuga-Barke, Edmund, Greenhill, Laurence L., Biederman, Joseph, Kollins, Scott, Nguyen, Annamarie Stehli +4 more·2004·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of 2 second-generation extended-release (ER) formulations of methylphenidate (MPH): Metadate CD (MCD; methylphenidate HCl, US Pharmacopeia) extended-release capsules, CII, and Concerta (CON; methylphenidate HCl) extended-release tablets, CII. Little empirical information exists to help the clinician compare the PD effects of the available ER formulations on attention and behavior. Previous studies have shown that the near-equal doses of MCD and CON provide equivalent, total exposure to MPH as measured by area under the plasma concentration time curve, yet their pharmacokinetic (PK) plasma concentration versus time profiles are different. We previously offered a theoretical PK/PD account of the similarities and differences among available ER formulations based on the hypothesis that all formulations produce effects related to MPH delivered by 2 processes: 1) an initial bolus dose of immediate-release (IR) MPH that is expected to achieve peak plasma concentration in the early morning and have rapid onset of efficacy within 2 hours of dosing, which for the MCD capsule is delivered by 30% of the total daily dose as uncoated beads and for the CON tablet is delivered by an overcoat of 22% of the total daily dose; and 2) an extended, controlled delivery of ER MPH that is expected to achieve peak plasma concentrations in the afternoon to maintain efficacy for a programmed period of t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.113.3.e206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 238

Authors
Swanson, J. M., Wigal, S. B., Wigal, T., Sonuga-Barke, E., Greenhill, L. L., Biederman, J., Kollins, S., Nguyen, A. S., DeCory, H. H., Hirshe Dirksen, S. J., Hatch, S. J., & the COMACS Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Celltech Americas, Inc, Rochester, New York
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
e206-e216
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1968752176
Cited by
238
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
methylphenidate, sustained-release formulation, Concerta, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, bioequivalence, double-blind crossover, experimental schools, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Capsules, Child, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Tablets, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review