The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward Understanding Kernicterus: A Challenge to Improve the Management of Jaundiced Newborns
Abstract
PURPOSE. We sought to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of total serum bilirubin concentration (TSB) and free (unbound) bilirubin concentration (Bf) as predictors of risk for bilirubin toxicity and kernicterus and to examine consistency between these findings and proposed mechanisms of bilirubin transport and brain uptake. METHODS. A review of literature was undertaken to define basic principles of bilirubin transport and brain uptake leading to neurotoxicity. We then reviewed experimental and clinical evidence that relate TSB or Bf to risk for bilirubin toxicity and kernicterus. RESULTS. There are insufficient published data to precisely define sensitivity and specificity of either TSB or Bf in determining risk for acute bilirubin neurotoxicity or chronic sequelae (kernicterus). However, available laboratory and clinical evidence indicate that Bf is better than TSB in discriminating risk for bilirubin toxicity in patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia. These findings are consistent with basic pharmacokinetic principles involved in bilirubin transport and tissue uptake. CONCLUSIONS. Experimental and clinical data strongly suggest that measurement of Bf in newborns with hyperbilirubinemia will improve risk assessment for neurotoxicity, which emphasizes the need for additional clinical evaluation relating Bf and TSB to acute bilirubin toxicity and long-term outcome. We speculate that establishing risk thresholds for neurotoxicity by using newer methods for measuring Bf in minimally diluted serum samples will improve the sensitivity and specificity of serum indicators for treating hyperbilirubinemia, thus reducing unnecessary aggressive intervention and associated cost and morbidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barrier Mechanisms in the Developing Brain
Saunders, N. R., Liddelow, S. A., & Dziegielewska, K. M. (2012) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2012.00046 · Cited by 502
Bilirubin-Induced Neurologic Damage — Mechanisms and Management Approaches
Watchko, J. F., & Tiribelli, C. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1308124 · Cited by 393
Bilirubin in clinical practice: a review
Fevery, J. (2008) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01716.x · Cited by 374
A Bilirubin-Inducible Fluorescent Protein from Eel Muscle
Kumagai, A., Ando, R., Miyatake, H., Greimel, P., Kobayashi, T., Hirabayashi, Y., Shimogori, T., & Miyawaki, A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.038 · Cited by 338
Kaplan, M., Bromiker, R., & Hammerman, C. (2011) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000330055 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Wennberg, R. P., Ahlfors, C. E., Bhutani, V. K., Johnson, L. H., & Shapiro, S. M.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 474-485
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2112675479
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Understanding Kernicterus: A Challenge to Improve the Management of Jaundiced Newborns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2005-0395
- The paper
- Wennberg, R. P., Ahlfors, C. E., Bhutani, V. K., Johnson, L. H., & Shapiro, S. M. (2006). Toward Understanding Kernicterus: A Challenge to Improve the Management of Jaundiced Newborns. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.