Tobacco Promotion and the Initiation of Tobacco Use: Assessing the Evidence for Causality
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. We sought to determine whether there is evidence of a causal link between exposure to tobacco promotion and the initiation of tobacco use by children. METHODS. We conducted a structured search in Medline, PsycINFO, and ABI/INFORM Global to identify relevant empirical research. The literature was examined against the Hill epidemiologic criteria for determining causality. RESULTS. (1) Children are exposed to tobacco promotion before the initiation of tobacco use; (2) exposure increases the risk for initiation; (3) there is a dose-response relationship, with greater exposure resulting in higher risk; (4) the increased risk is robust; it is observed with various study methods, in multiple populations, and with various forms of promotion and persists after controlling for other factors; (5) scientifically plausible mechanisms whereby promotion could influence initiation exist; and (6) no explanation other than causality can account for the evidence. CONCLUSIONS. Promotions foster positive attitudes, beliefs, and expectations regarding tobacco use. This fosters intentions to use and increases the likelihood of initiation. Greater exposure to promotion leads to higher risk. This is seen in diverse cultures and persists when other risk factors, such as socioeconomic status or parental and peer smoking, are controlled. Causality is the only plausible scientific explanation for the observed data. The evidence satisfies the Hill criteria, indicating that exposure to tobacco promotion causes children to initiate tobacco use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The powerful effects of tobacco advertising and promotion on consumer behavior are well documented, particularly among children and adolescents.
“The powerful effects of tobacco advertising and promotion on consumer behavior are well documented, particularly among children and adolescents.22,474–478”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [475]
In longitudinal studies, exposure to tobacco marketing is consistently related to positive attitudes and beliefs about tobacco use, experimenting with cigarettes, and becoming a smoker, with a dose-response relation between extent of exposure to marketing and risk.
“In longitudinal studies, exposure to tobacco marketing is consistently related to positive attitudes and beliefs about tobacco use, experimenting with cigarettes, and becoming a smoker, with a dose-response relation between extent of exposure to marketing and risk.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [475]
The clear impact of advertising on tobacco-related attitudes and behaviors provides robust evidence that the absence or limitation of such influences reduces their pro-tobacco effects in youth.
“Overall, the clear impact of advertising on tobacco-related attitudes and behaviors22,474–478 provides robust evidence that the absence or limitation of such influences reduces their pro-tobacco effects in youth.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [475]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 130 · Cited by 257
- Authors
- DiFranza, J. R., Wellman, R. J., Sargent, J. D., Weitzman, M., Hipple, B. J., Winickoff, J. P., & for the Tobacco Consortium, C. F. C. H. R. O. T. A. A. O. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Center for Child Health Research, Rochester, New York
- MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1237-e1248
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2147959226
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- tobacco promotion, tobacco initiation, children, adolescents, causal inference, Hill criterion, dose-response relationship, tobacco advertising, attitudes toward smoking, socioeconomic status
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Advertising, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Smoking, Causality, Tobacco Industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review