The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parents With Doubts About Vaccines: Which Vaccines and Reasons Why
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. The goals were (1) to obtain national estimates of the proportions of parents with indicators of vaccine doubt, (2) to identify factors associated with those parents, compared with parents reporting no vaccine doubt indicators, (3) to identify the specific vaccines that prompted doubt and the reasons why, and (4) to describe the main reasons parents changed their minds about delaying or refusing a vaccine for their child. METHODS. Data were from the National Immunization Survey (2003–2004). Groups included parents who ever got a vaccination for their child although they were not sure it was the best thing to do (“unsure”), delayed a vaccination for their child (“delayed”), or decided not to have their child get a vaccination (“refused”). RESULTS. A total of 3924 interviews were completed. Response rates were 57.9% in 2003 and 65.0% in 2004. Twenty-eight percent of parents responded yes to ever experiencing ≥1 of the outcome measures listed above. In separate analyses for each outcome measure, vaccine safety concern was a predictor for unsure, refused, and delayed parents. The largest proportions of unsure and refused parents chose varicella vaccine as the vaccine prompting their concern, whereas delayed parents most often reported “not a specific vaccine” as the vaccine prompting their concern. Most parents who delayed vaccines for their child did so for reasons related to their child's illness, unlike the unsure and refused parents. The largest proportion of parents who changed their minds about delaying or not getting a vaccination for their child listed “information or assurances from health care provider” as the main reason. CONCLUSIONS. Parents who exhibit doubts about immunizations are not all the same. This research suggests encouraging children's health care providers to solicit questions about vaccines, to establish a trusting relationship, and to provide appropriate educational materials to parents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust
Benin, A. L., Wisler-Scher, D. J., Colson, E., Shapiro, E. D., & Holmboe, E. S. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1728 · Cited by 608
Cited by
Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. D., & Paterson, P. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081 · Cited by 2,254
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2365 · Cited by 1,300
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review
Yaqub, O., Castle-Clarke, S., Sevdalis, N., & Chataway, J. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.018 · Cited by 1,089
Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications
Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.2015.964212 · Cited by 986
Metadata
- Authors
- Gust, D. A., Darling, N., Kennedy, A., & Schwartz, B.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2008-10-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 718-725
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2075410325
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parents With Doubts About Vaccines: Which Vaccines and Reasons Why. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2007-0538
- The paper
- Gust, D. A., Darling, N., Kennedy, A., & Schwartz, B. (2008). Parents With Doubts About Vaccines: Which Vaccines and Reasons Why. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.