Cited by 188Trace Elements in HealthChild Nutrition and Water AccessViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

A meta-analysis of the effects of oral zinc in the treatment of acute and persistent diarrhea

Lukacik, Marek, Thomas, Ronald L., Aranda, Jacob V.·2008·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Children in developing countries are at a high risk for zinc deficiency. Supplemental zinc has previously been shown to provide therapeutic benefits in diarrhea. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of supplemental oral zinc therapy during recovery from acute or persistent diarrhea. METHODS. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of supplementary oral zinc with placebo in children with acute and persistent diarrhea. Results were reported using a pooled relative risk or a weighted mean difference. A total of 22 studies were identified for inclusion: 16 examined acute diarrhea (n = 15231), and 6 examined persistent diarrhea (n = 2968). RESULTS. Mean duration of acute diarrhea and persistent diarrhea was significantly lower for zinc compared with placebo. Presence of diarrhea between zinc and placebo at day 1 was not significantly different in acute diarrhea or persistent diarrhea trials. At day 3, presence was significantly lower for zinc in persistent diarrhea trials (n = 221) but not in acute diarrhea trials. Vomiting after therapy was significantly higher for zinc in 11 acute diarrhea trials (n = 4438) and 4 persistent diarrhea trials (n = 2969). Those who received zinc gluconate in comparison with zinc sulfate/acetate vomited more frequently. Overall, children who received zinc reported an 18.8% and 12.5% reduction in average stool frequency, 15.0% and 15.5% shortening of diarrhea duration, and a 17.9% and 18.0% probability of reducing diarrhea over placebo in acute and persistent trials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Zinc supplementation reduces the duration and severity of acute and persistent diarrhea; however, the mechanisms by which zinc exerts its antidiarrheal effect have not been fully elucidated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-0921

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukacik, M., Thomas, R. L., & Aranda, J. V.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lukacik, Marek
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
326-336
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1971243234
Cited by
188
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
oral zinc supplementation, acute diarrhea, persistent diarrhea, childhood diarrhea, zinc deficiency, zinc gluconate, zinc sulfate, vomiting, stool frequency, diarrhea duration, antidiarrheal effect, children
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Child, Diarrhea, Gluconates, Humans, Time Factors, Vomiting, Zinc, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Zinc Sulfate, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review