The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. This review is an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force on universal newborn hearing screening to detect moderate-to-severe permanent, bilateral congenital hearing loss. We focus on 3 key questions: (1) Among infants identified by universal screening who would not be identified by targeted screening, does initiating treatment before 6 months of age improve language and communication outcomes? (2) Compared with targeted screening, does universal screening increase the chance that treatment will be initiated by 6 months of age for infants at average risk or for those at high risk? (3) What are the adverse effects of screening and early treatment? METHODS. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched to identify articles published since the 2002 recommendation. Data from studies that met inclusion criteria were abstracted, and studies were rated for quality with predetermined criteria. RESULTS. A good-quality retrospective study of children with hearing loss indicates that those who had early versus late confirmation and those who had undergone universal newborn screening versus none had better receptive language at 8 years of age but not better expressive language or speech. A good-quality nonrandomized trial of a large birth cohort indicates that infants identified with hearing loss through universal newborn screening have earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those not screened. These findings are corroborated by multiple descriptive studies of ages of referral, diagnosis, and treatment. Usual parental reactions to an initial nonpass on a hearing screen include worry, questioning, and distress that resolve for most parents. Cochlear implants have been associated with higher risks for bacterial meningitis in young children. CONCLUSIONS. Children with hearing loss who had universal newborn hearing screening have better language outcomes at school age than those not screened. Infants identified with hearing loss through universal screening have significantly earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those identified in other ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
American Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association
Weiner, F. F., & Ketzenberger, K. E. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0119 · Cited by 2,557
Language of Early- and Later-identified Children With Hearing Loss
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A. L., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.102.5.1161 · Cited by 2,150
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2333 · Cited by 2,056
Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Harris, R. P., Helfand, M., Woolf, S. H., Lohr, K. N., Mulrow, C. D., Teutsch, S. M., & Atkins, D. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00261-6 · Cited by 1,731
Early Intervention and Language Development in Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Moeller, M. P. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.3.e43 · Cited by 1,472
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, & Agencies, D. O. S. A. H. P. I. S. H. A. W. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.4.798 · Cited by 1,282
Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J. (2002) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004 · Cited by 947
Language Ability after Early Detection of Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment
Kennedy, C. R., McCann, D. C., Campbell, M. J., Law, C. M., Mullee, M., Petrou, S., Watkin, P., Worsfold, S., Yuen, H. M., & Stevenson, J. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054915 · Cited by 534
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening
Thompson, D. C., McPhillips, H. A., Davis, R. L., Lieu, T. A., Homer, C. J., & Helfand, M. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.16.2000 · Cited by 375
Risk of Bacterial Meningitis in Children with Cochlear Implants
Reefhuis, J., Honein, M. A., Whitney, C. G., Chamany, S., Mann, E. A., Biernath, K. R., Broder, K., Manning, S., Avashia, S., Victor, M., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa031101 · Cited by 368
Cited by
Sign Language and Spoken Language for Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review
Fitzpatrick, E. M., Hamel, C., Stevens, A., Pratt, M., Moher, D., Doucet, S. P., Neuss, D., Bernstein, A., & Na, E. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1974 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, H. D., Bougatsos, C., & Nygren, P.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e266-e276
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2055943185
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2007-1422
- The paper
- Nelson, H. D., Bougatsos, C., & Nygren, P. (2008). Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.