The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation
Abstract
In Brief Objective The aim of the present experiment was to assess the consequences of cochlear implantation at different ages on the development of the human central auditory system. Design Our measure of the maturity of central auditory pathways was the latency of the P1 cortical auditory evoked potential. Because P1 latencies vary as a function of chronological age, they can be used to infer the maturational status of auditory pathways in congenitally deafened children who regain hearing after being fit with a cochlear implant. We examined the development of P1 response latencies in 104 congenitally deaf children who had been fit with cochlear implants at ages ranging from 1.3 yr to 17.5 yr and three congenitally deaf adults. The independent variable was the duration of deafness before cochlear implantation. The dependent variable was the latency of the P1 cortical auditory evoked potential. Results A comparison of P1 latencies in implanted children with those of age-matched normal-hearing peers revealed that implanted children with the longest period of auditory deprivation before implantation—7 or more yr—had abnormal cortical response latencies to speech. Implanted children with the shortest period of auditory deprivation—approximately 3.5 yr or less—evidenced age-appropriate latency responses within 6 mo after the onset of electrical stimulation. Conclusions Our data suggest that in the absence of normal stimulation there is a sensitive period of about 3.5 yr during which the human central auditory system remains maximally plastic. Plasticity remains in some, but not all children until approximately age 7. After age 7, plasticity is greatly reduced. These data may be relevant to the issue of when best to place a cochlear implant in a congenitally deaf child. Because P1 latencies of the cortical auditory evoked potential vary as a function of chronological age, they can be used to infer the maturational status of auditory pathways and the human central auditory system. This measure was used to assess the consequences of deafness and of cochlear implantation at different ages on auditory development. The development of P1 response latencies was measured in 104 congenitally deaf people who had been fitted with cochlear implants at ages ranging from 1.3 years to adulthood. A comparison of P1 latencies in implanted children with those of age-matched normal-hearing peers revealed that implanted children with the longest period of auditory deprivation before implantation-7 or more years-had abnormal cortical response latencies to speech. Implanted children with no more than 3.5 years of auditory deprivation evidenced age-appropriate latency responses within 6 months after the onset of electrical stimulation. These data suggest that in the absence of normal stimulation there is a sensitive period of about 3.5 years during which the human central auditory system remains maximally plastic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Ceponiene, 1998, Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 345, 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00081-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Cunningham, 2000, Ear Hearing, 21, 554, 10.1097/00003446-200012000-00003 · DOI
- Eggermont, 1997, Acta Otolaryngologia, 117, 161, 10.3109/00016489709117760 · DOI
- Erwin, 1987, Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement, 40, 461
- Finney, 2001, Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1171, 10.1038/nn763 · DOI · Paper page
- Hardie, 1999, Hearing Research, 128, 147, 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00209-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Hartmann, 1997, Hearing Research, 112, 115, 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00114-7 · DOI
- Hsu, 2001, Journal of Computational Neurology, 438, 226, 10.1002/cne.1311 · doi:10.1002/cne.1311
- Huttenlocher, 1997, Journal of Computational Neurology, 387, 167, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-Z · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-z
- Klinke, 2001, Audiology Neuro-Otology, 6, 203, 10.1159/000046833 · DOI
- Klinke, 1999, Science, 285, 1729, 10.1126/science.285.5434.1729 · DOI · Paper page
- Kral, 2000, Cerebral Cortex, 10, 714, 10.1093/cercor/10.7.714 · DOI · Paper page
- Kral, 2002, Cerebral Cortex, 12, 797, 10.1093/cercor/12.8.797 · DOI · Paper page
- Kraus, 1995, Ear Hearing, 16, 19, 10.1097/00003446-199502000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
- Leake, 1992, Hearing Research, 64, 99, 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90172-J · DOI
- Lee, 2001, Nature, 409, 149, 10.1038/35051653 · DOI · Paper page
- Liegeois-Chauvel, 1994, Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 204, 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90064-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Maurer, 1999, Science, 286, 108, 10.1126/science.286.5437.108 · DOI · Paper page
- McFeely, 1998, American Journal of Otology, 19, 467
- McGee, 1996, Ear Hearing, 17, 419, 10.1097/00003446-199610000-00008 · DOI
- Moore, 1994, Journal of Computational Neurology, 339, 301, 10.1002/cne.903390209 · DOI
- Nishimura, 1999, Nature, 397, 116, 10.1038/16376 · DOI · Paper page
- Nordeen, 1983, Journal of Computational Neurology, 214, 144, 10.1002/cne.902140204 · DOI · Paper page
- Ponton, 1996a, Neuroreport, 8, 61, 10.1097/00001756-199612200-00013 · DOI · Paper page
- Ponton, 1996b, Ear Hearing, 17, 430, 10.1097/00003446-199617031-00008 · DOI
- Ponton, 2001, Audiology Neurotology, 6, 363, 10.1159/000046846 · DOI · Paper page
- Ponton, 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 220, 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00236-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Ponton, 1999, Scandinavian Audiology Supplement, 51, 13
- Ryugo, 1997, Journal of Computational Neurology, 385, 230, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970825)385:2<230::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-2 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970825)385:2<230::aid-cne4>3.0.co;2-2
- Ryugo, 1998, Journal of Computational Neurology, 397, 532, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980810)397:4<532::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-2 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980810)397:4<532::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-2
- Sharma, 2002a, Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 111, 38, 10.1177/00034894021110S508 · DOI
- Sharma, 2002b, Neuroreport, 13, 1365, 10.1097/00001756-200207190-00030 · DOI
- Sharma, 1997, Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology, 104, 540, 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00050-6 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications
Cramer, S. C., Sur, M., Dobkin, B. H., O'Brien, C., Sanger, T. D., Trojanowski, J. Q., Rumsey, J. M., Hicks, R., Cameron, J., Chen, D., et al. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr039 · Cited by 1,259
Self-citationZeng, F.-G. (2004) · Trends in Amplification · doi:10.1177/108471380400800102 · Cited by 401
Effects of Early Auditory Experience on the Spoken Language of Deaf Children at 3 Years of Age
Nicholas, J. G., & Geers, A. E. (2006) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6 · Cited by 375
Tomblin, J. B., Barker, B. A., Spencer, L. J., Zhang, X., & Gantz, B. J. (2005) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/059 · Cited by 300
Clinical disorders of brain plasticity
Johnston, M. V. (2004) · Brain and Development · doi:10.1016/s0387-7604(03)00102-5 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 532-539
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079617023
- Cited by
- 947
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004
- The paper
- Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J. (2002). A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.